SAN-RAFAEL, California Odar offices
At the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in San-rafael, CALIFORNIA, 10 different administrative law judges (ALJ) conduct Social Security Disability (SSD) hearings and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) hearings. Currently, in San-rafael, the average wait time for a SSI or SSD hearing is 15 months. The average case processing time in San-rafael is 542 days. The San-rafael average for winning a SSI or SSD disibility hearing is 54%. Click on the name of one of the ALJs below to see detailed information about their hearing results. This information for the San-rafael ODAR office was last updated on 09/25/2020.
AVERAGE STATISTICS
| Office | Judges | Avg. Hearing | Average Processing Time |
Avg. Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Cases Dismissed |
Cases Approved |
Cases Denied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN RAFAEL | 10 | 15.0 months | 542 days | 2.1 | 20% | 54% | 26% |
| CALIFORNIA | 11.8 months | 419 days | 2.0 | 18% | 46% | 36% | |
| National Average: | 11.8 months | 418 days | 1.9 | 18% | 44% | 38% | |
AVERAGE TIME
| Hearing Wait Time |
Depositions Per Day Per ALJ |
Average Processing Time |
Cases Pending |
Depositions | New Cases | Hearings In Person |
Video Hearings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.00 months | 2.05 | 542 days | 1721 | 1301 | 581 | 50% | 50% |
LIST OF JUDGES / 18
| Full Name | Dismissed | Approved | Denied |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amita B Tracy | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Timothy C Terrill | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Trevor Skarda | 39% | 25% | 36% |
| Donna W Shipps | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Paul G Robeck | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| John R Price | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mary Beth O'Connor | 45% | 19% | 36% |
| Wynne O'Brien-Persons | 33% | 0% | 67% |
| David R Mazzi | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Julia Mariani | 70% | 14% | 16% |
| K. Kwon | 47% | 26% | 27% |
| Suzanne Krolikowski | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Serena S Hong | 57% | 22% | 21% |
| Alberto E Gonzalez | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Michael Cabotaje | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Michael A Cabotaje | 52% | 20% | 28% |
| Patricia A Bucci | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| Maxine R Benmour | 0% | 0% | 0% |
321 Comments
still pretty good but used to be better she's nice and compassionate. Just doesn't grant a much anymore.
still pretty good but used to be better she's nice and compassionate. Just doesn't grant a much anymore.
still pretty good but used to be better she's nice and compassionate. Just doesn't grant a much anymore.
i received a non favorable descision from this judge, yet she seemed to be irritated with my representation and wanted to leave the court room early, like she was in a rush to finish my case...some of the things she wrote in my descision seed one sided and not to sdupportive to me. she questionede my creditability on a few subjects and fails to understand the nature of back injuries...i don't understand how i could suffer for so long and still be denied. she needs to understand how these injuries effect our lives...maybe if she had an injury herself in her lower back she would understand the nature of consistant pain...you will hear from me again as i pick appart her descision!
i received a non favorable descision from this judge, yet she seemed to be irritated with my representation and wanted to leave the court room early, like she was in a rush to finish my case...some of the things she wrote in my descision seed one sided and not to sdupportive to me. she questionede my creditability on a few subjects and fails to understand the nature of back injuries...i don't understand how i could suffer for so long and still be denied. she needs to understand how these injuries effect our lives...maybe if she had an injury herself in her lower back she would understand the nature of consistant pain...you will hear from me again as i pick appart her descision!
i received a non favorable descision from this judge, yet she seemed to be irritated with my representation and wanted to leave the court room early, like she was in a rush to finish my case...some of the things she wrote in my descision seed one sided and not to sdupportive to me. she questionede my creditability on a few subjects and fails to understand the nature of back injuries...i don't understand how i could suffer for so long and still be denied. she needs to understand how these injuries effect our lives...maybe if she had an injury herself in her lower back she would understand the nature of consistant pain...you will hear from me again as i pick appart her descision!
She was a very nice fair person.. I loved her personality.. And I appreciate her listening to my situation..
She was a very nice fair person.. I loved her personality.. And I appreciate her listening to my situation..
She was a very nice fair person.. I loved her personality.. And I appreciate her listening to my situation..
I found Judge Benmour to be very fair, considerate and kind.
I found Judge Benmour to be very fair, considerate and kind.
I found Judge Benmour to be very fair, considerate and kind.
She out and out lies. There were several wrong statements in my Notice of Decision. This includes rephrasing of said statements to support her clearly biased side. She was not "judging" me she was the prosecutor.
She out and out lies. There were several wrong statements in my Notice of Decision. This includes rephrasing of said statements to support her clearly biased side. She was not "judging" me she was the prosecutor.
She out and out lies. There were several wrong statements in my Notice of Decision. This includes rephrasing of said statements to support her clearly biased side. She was not "judging" me she was the prosecutor.
judgemental
judgemental
judgemental
Imagine that. An ALJ who someone thinks is "judgemental." Wow.
Imagine that. An ALJ who someone thinks is "judgemental." Wow.
Imagine that. An ALJ who someone thinks is "judgemental." Wow.
Bad-very bad..
Bad-very bad..
Bad-very bad..
She is an idiot and did not even mention my current doctor's name or my MRI in my denial letter. I was screwed over and now homeless. Who gave her this job?
She is an idiot and did not even mention my current doctor's name or my MRI in my denial letter. I was screwed over and now homeless. Who gave her this job?
She is an idiot and did not even mention my current doctor's name or my MRI in my denial letter. I was screwed over and now homeless. Who gave her this job?
Maybe she cannot perform the ALJ duties. Wrong job to be in. She should find something else to do.
Maybe she cannot perform the ALJ duties. Wrong job to be in. She should find something else to do.
Maybe she cannot perform the ALJ duties. Wrong job to be in. She should find something else to do.
I think she is very reasonable,she based her decisions from medical evidence,I'm sure sure she is more than qualified for her job,quit complaining.im still waiting for my result but no matter what her decision so be it,I'm thankful that I've reached to have a fair hearing.usmc vet
I think she is very reasonable,she based her decisions from medical evidence,I'm sure sure she is more than qualified for her job,quit complaining.im still waiting for my result but no matter what her decision so be it,I'm thankful that I've reached to have a fair hearing.usmc vet
I think she is very reasonable,she based her decisions from medical evidence,I'm sure sure she is more than qualified for her job,quit complaining.im still waiting for my result but no matter what her decision so be it,I'm thankful that I've reached to have a fair hearing.usmc vet
I think she is very reasonable,she based her decisions from medical evidence,I'm sure sure she is more than qualified for her job,quit complaining.im still waiting for my result but no matter what her decision so be it,I'm thankful that I've reached to have a fair hearing.usmc vet
I think she is very reasonable,she based her decisions from medical evidence,I'm sure sure she is more than qualified for her job,quit complaining.im still waiting for my result but no matter what her decision so be it,I'm thankful that I've reached to have a fair hearing.usmc vet
I think she is very reasonable,she based her decisions from medical evidence,I'm sure sure she is more than qualified for her job,quit complaining.im still waiting for my result but no matter what her decision so be it,I'm thankful that I've reached to have a fair hearing.usmc vet
Very biased, her decision is already made before yes, before you enter te room. It's not " informal", comments and reports are unfounded and incorrect. Often disagrees with the "states" Dr. Opinions.
Very biased, her decision is already made before yes, before you enter te room. It's not " informal", comments and reports are unfounded and incorrect. Often disagrees with the "states" Dr. Opinions.
Very biased, her decision is already made before yes, before you enter te room. It's not " informal", comments and reports are unfounded and incorrect. Often disagrees with the "states" Dr. Opinions.
May God give her wisdom and guidance on her decision making,she is doing the hardest job as an ALJ,she disapproved my claim but i know she had done her best.God bless you!!!
May God give her wisdom and guidance on her decision making,she is doing the hardest job as an ALJ,she disapproved my claim but i know she had done her best.God bless you!!!
May God give her wisdom and guidance on her decision making,she is doing the hardest job as an ALJ,she disapproved my claim but i know she had done her best.God bless you!!!
Thankfully there is a higher level of judges to go on appeal. Bucci was overturned by higher powers and no, I never received a fair hearing from her. She ignored medical facts , treating source opinions and took it upon herself to make the decision without ever even weighing in consideration the treating sources and opinions. Do your homework folks, this Judge has one of the worst approval ratings in the nation and so does the Northern Phoenix Office. Their approval average is 36% at a hearing level and the national average is 47% at a hearing level. What does this mean? That means out of 100 cases, only 36 will be approved. Out of every 100 people who get to a hearing, 11 people more will be denied benefits that they really needed to survive. It gives pause for thought as to why this North Phoenix Office denies more cases than any other Arizona office. This is federal so all should be about equal but they are not. I pity you if your hearing in in the North Phoenix office.
Thankfully there is a higher level of judges to go on appeal. Bucci was overturned by higher powers and no, I never received a fair hearing from her. She ignored medical facts , treating source opinions and took it upon herself to make the decision without ever even weighing in consideration the treating sources and opinions. Do your homework folks, this Judge has one of the worst approval ratings in the nation and so does the Northern Phoenix Office. Their approval average is 36% at a hearing level and the national average is 47% at a hearing level. What does this mean? That means out of 100 cases, only 36 will be approved. Out of every 100 people who get to a hearing, 11 people more will be denied benefits that they really needed to survive. It gives pause for thought as to why this North Phoenix Office denies more cases than any other Arizona office. This is federal so all should be about equal but they are not. I pity you if your hearing in in the North Phoenix office.
Thankfully there is a higher level of judges to go on appeal. Bucci was overturned by higher powers and no, I never received a fair hearing from her. She ignored medical facts , treating source opinions and took it upon herself to make the decision without ever even weighing in consideration the treating sources and opinions. Do your homework folks, this Judge has one of the worst approval ratings in the nation and so does the Northern Phoenix Office. Their approval average is 36% at a hearing level and the national average is 47% at a hearing level. What does this mean? That means out of 100 cases, only 36 will be approved. Out of every 100 people who get to a hearing, 11 people more will be denied benefits that they really needed to survive. It gives pause for thought as to why this North Phoenix Office denies more cases than any other Arizona office. This is federal so all should be about equal but they are not. I pity you if your hearing in in the North Phoenix office.
I think it is time AZ residents start standing up about this unfair treatment from the North Phoenix SSD office!!! We are getting treated unfairly and have a far less chance of winning than any other AZ office of disability!!! 4 bad judges who deny 70 % of all hearing cases that cross their courtroom and this is discriminating against us that get our case stuck there. What can we do? Stand up and complain, write to Congress, Senate and everybody else...get it in the news!!!! Queens NY did it last year and they won against the bad judges there. Those judges were not even denying as many cases as this North Phoenix office is denying. If they can do it, why can't we? No, we can't get them fired, but we can try to get them out of our state!!!!
I think it is time AZ residents start standing up about this unfair treatment from the North Phoenix SSD office!!! We are getting treated unfairly and have a far less chance of winning than any other AZ office of disability!!! 4 bad judges who deny 70 % of all hearing cases that cross their courtroom and this is discriminating against us that get our case stuck there. What can we do? Stand up and complain, write to Congress, Senate and everybody else...get it in the news!!!! Queens NY did it last year and they won against the bad judges there. Those judges were not even denying as many cases as this North Phoenix office is denying. If they can do it, why can't we? No, we can't get them fired, but we can try to get them out of our state!!!!
I think it is time AZ residents start standing up about this unfair treatment from the North Phoenix SSD office!!! We are getting treated unfairly and have a far less chance of winning than any other AZ office of disability!!! 4 bad judges who deny 70 % of all hearing cases that cross their courtroom and this is discriminating against us that get our case stuck there. What can we do? Stand up and complain, write to Congress, Senate and everybody else...get it in the news!!!! Queens NY did it last year and they won against the bad judges there. Those judges were not even denying as many cases as this North Phoenix office is denying. If they can do it, why can't we? No, we can't get them fired, but we can try to get them out of our state!!!!
It seems very odd that all these judges had 40% plus cases approved prior to coming to phoenix north but even in there first year in phoenix north they approve a dramatically less amount of cases. Most judges were close to 50% approval before phoenix and to drop 20% approval rating based on nothing but geography is eye opening. It also seems odd that she has a consistent denial percentage over a 3 year period. As if they have a pre designated percentage they are to meet given to them from higher up the chain. This is actually factual on a federal level but the national accepted approval rating is much higher than 27%. I'm sure that is shocking to no one but the concern here is the blatant unfair judgments that are decided based on numbers and not the individuals plight. We could dismiss these percentages based on the fact that phoenix may hold a greater number of legitimately deniable cases than the national average but Judge Bucci was giving close to %50 approval in Chicago. No offense to Chicago but there is a zero possibilitie that Phoenix is any worse than Chicago in the fraud category or for that matter that people in Phoenix are any less capable of deciding for themselves prior to the application period if they are able bodied enough to work or not. The fact that this location has gotten to these numbers without a federal investigation only raises more questions. With a 10-15% approval going to the automatics, such as paraplegics and people of guaranteed wins it only leaves 15-20% shot for people who have unique or debatable disabilities such as pain and immeasurable conditions. I have yet to meet a Dr. that hasn't unequivocally said that there is no possibility that I can work again( I have seen 12 Drs/specialists over just the last two years) and I have been going through this process for three years with no approval and no light at the end of the tunnel. I hope to all who those truly incapable of creating even a meager living the best of luck in getting an approval. Remember if you stay with it long enough eventually your case will be in front of someone who actually looks at you as an individual and not a percentage.
It seems very odd that all these judges had 40% plus cases approved prior to coming to phoenix north but even in there first year in phoenix north they approve a dramatically less amount of cases. Most judges were close to 50% approval before phoenix and to drop 20% approval rating based on nothing but geography is eye opening. It also seems odd that she has a consistent denial percentage over a 3 year period. As if they have a pre designated percentage they are to meet given to them from higher up the chain. This is actually factual on a federal level but the national accepted approval rating is much higher than 27%. I'm sure that is shocking to no one but the concern here is the blatant unfair judgments that are decided based on numbers and not the individuals plight. We could dismiss these percentages based on the fact that phoenix may hold a greater number of legitimately deniable cases than the national average but Judge Bucci was giving close to %50 approval in Chicago. No offense to Chicago but there is a zero possibilitie that Phoenix is any worse than Chicago in the fraud category or for that matter that people in Phoenix are any less capable of deciding for themselves prior to the application period if they are able bodied enough to work or not. The fact that this location has gotten to these numbers without a federal investigation only raises more questions. With a 10-15% approval going to the automatics, such as paraplegics and people of guaranteed wins it only leaves 15-20% shot for people who have unique or debatable disabilities such as pain and immeasurable conditions. I have yet to meet a Dr. that hasn't unequivocally said that there is no possibility that I can work again( I have seen 12 Drs/specialists over just the last two years) and I have been going through this process for three years with no approval and no light at the end of the tunnel. I hope to all who those truly incapable of creating even a meager living the best of luck in getting an approval. Remember if you stay with it long enough eventually your case will be in front of someone who actually looks at you as an individual and not a percentage.
It seems very odd that all these judges had 40% plus cases approved prior to coming to phoenix north but even in there first year in phoenix north they approve a dramatically less amount of cases. Most judges were close to 50% approval before phoenix and to drop 20% approval rating based on nothing but geography is eye opening. It also seems odd that she has a consistent denial percentage over a 3 year period. As if they have a pre designated percentage they are to meet given to them from higher up the chain. This is actually factual on a federal level but the national accepted approval rating is much higher than 27%. I'm sure that is shocking to no one but the concern here is the blatant unfair judgments that are decided based on numbers and not the individuals plight. We could dismiss these percentages based on the fact that phoenix may hold a greater number of legitimately deniable cases than the national average but Judge Bucci was giving close to %50 approval in Chicago. No offense to Chicago but there is a zero possibilitie that Phoenix is any worse than Chicago in the fraud category or for that matter that people in Phoenix are any less capable of deciding for themselves prior to the application period if they are able bodied enough to work or not. The fact that this location has gotten to these numbers without a federal investigation only raises more questions. With a 10-15% approval going to the automatics, such as paraplegics and people of guaranteed wins it only leaves 15-20% shot for people who have unique or debatable disabilities such as pain and immeasurable conditions. I have yet to meet a Dr. that hasn't unequivocally said that there is no possibility that I can work again( I have seen 12 Drs/specialists over just the last two years) and I have been going through this process for three years with no approval and no light at the end of the tunnel. I hope to all who those truly incapable of creating even a meager living the best of luck in getting an approval. Remember if you stay with it long enough eventually your case will be in front of someone who actually looks at you as an individual and not a percentage.
It's a hard job to do! I'm sure she does her very best to help people that need it and our medically unable to work. I have a feeling many people struggle with the concept of not being able to work and differentiating it from not WANTING to work!
It's a hard job to do! I'm sure she does her very best to help people that need it and our medically unable to work. I have a feeling many people struggle with the concept of not being able to work and differentiating it from not WANTING to work!
It's a hard job to do! I'm sure she does her very best to help people that need it and our medically unable to work. I have a feeling many people struggle with the concept of not being able to work and differentiating it from not WANTING to work!
I will reserve judgement until I get the judgement on my remand hearing. Just a note to those waiting, if you want to speed up your case, get in touch with your congressman. They can help speed it up if it is a dire need case. I will say I agree with the North Phoenix office denying far more cases than they should be. This hurts us in AZ if we happen to get our case sent there. 31/2 years I have been waiting for help on my case with no income and no help. I think we need to get an investigation going on this North Phoenix office. The lawyers know they are unfair and cringe when you say that is where your hearing is at. Some lawyers will not even take your case if you have a hearing here.
I will reserve judgement until I get the judgement on my remand hearing. Just a note to those waiting, if you want to speed up your case, get in touch with your congressman. They can help speed it up if it is a dire need case. I will say I agree with the North Phoenix office denying far more cases than they should be. This hurts us in AZ if we happen to get our case sent there. 31/2 years I have been waiting for help on my case with no income and no help. I think we need to get an investigation going on this North Phoenix office. The lawyers know they are unfair and cringe when you say that is where your hearing is at. Some lawyers will not even take your case if you have a hearing here.
I will reserve judgement until I get the judgement on my remand hearing. Just a note to those waiting, if you want to speed up your case, get in touch with your congressman. They can help speed it up if it is a dire need case. I will say I agree with the North Phoenix office denying far more cases than they should be. This hurts us in AZ if we happen to get our case sent there. 31/2 years I have been waiting for help on my case with no income and no help. I think we need to get an investigation going on this North Phoenix office. The lawyers know they are unfair and cringe when you say that is where your hearing is at. Some lawyers will not even take your case if you have a hearing here.
I have just received my decision letter from Judge Bucci for a remand hearing. This means I appealed her denial in 04/2012 and we managed to get her first decision overturned and a remand hearing. After 17 months of waiting, building the case, getting mri's and new evidence I was then sent back to this same judge. Yes you heard it!!! Same judge who denied me the first time. This is standard practice on a remand. We didn't just equal an impairment, we met the requirements of an impairment under diseases of the spine 1.04 with mris that backed us up along with other testing. Judge Bucci failed to even mention the MRI that proved we met the requirement. She minimized my impairments, disallowed every doctor I had in the last 4 years, wrote a19 page denial letter herself, not trusting a law writer to do it and threw stuff in that made no sense at all. We knew she was a bad judge on approvals but we expected to get a partially favorable decision from her considering the evidence we had. Nope..... Denied!!!!! This case has been ongoing since 2010 with no resolution. Now what? I appeal since she blatantly left information out and this is an error in law? Appeal and another 2 to 3 years with no benefits? Reapply? Lose all back pay and 1 1/2 years more no benefits? This is a nightmare I can't wake up from!!!' When a judge abuses power and gets the "I Am God, Doctor and shrink rolled up all in one" complex..it spells bad news for claimants desperately needing benefits. My lawyer's advice? Move...move far away from this North Phoenix Office!!!! Lawyers are turning down cases now from claimants who have a hearing scheduled here because they can't win and they can't work for free.
I have just received my decision letter from Judge Bucci for a remand hearing. This means I appealed her denial in 04/2012 and we managed to get her first decision overturned and a remand hearing. After 17 months of waiting, building the case, getting mri's and new evidence I was then sent back to this same judge. Yes you heard it!!! Same judge who denied me the first time. This is standard practice on a remand. We didn't just equal an impairment, we met the requirements of an impairment under diseases of the spine 1.04 with mris that backed us up along with other testing. Judge Bucci failed to even mention the MRI that proved we met the requirement. She minimized my impairments, disallowed every doctor I had in the last 4 years, wrote a19 page denial letter herself, not trusting a law writer to do it and threw stuff in that made no sense at all. We knew she was a bad judge on approvals but we expected to get a partially favorable decision from her considering the evidence we had. Nope..... Denied!!!!! This case has been ongoing since 2010 with no resolution. Now what? I appeal since she blatantly left information out and this is an error in law? Appeal and another 2 to 3 years with no benefits? Reapply? Lose all back pay and 1 1/2 years more no benefits? This is a nightmare I can't wake up from!!!' When a judge abuses power and gets the "I Am God, Doctor and shrink rolled up all in one" complex..it spells bad news for claimants desperately needing benefits. My lawyer's advice? Move...move far away from this North Phoenix Office!!!! Lawyers are turning down cases now from claimants who have a hearing scheduled here because they can't win and they can't work for free.
I have just received my decision letter from Judge Bucci for a remand hearing. This means I appealed her denial in 04/2012 and we managed to get her first decision overturned and a remand hearing. After 17 months of waiting, building the case, getting mri's and new evidence I was then sent back to this same judge. Yes you heard it!!! Same judge who denied me the first time. This is standard practice on a remand. We didn't just equal an impairment, we met the requirements of an impairment under diseases of the spine 1.04 with mris that backed us up along with other testing. Judge Bucci failed to even mention the MRI that proved we met the requirement. She minimized my impairments, disallowed every doctor I had in the last 4 years, wrote a19 page denial letter herself, not trusting a law writer to do it and threw stuff in that made no sense at all. We knew she was a bad judge on approvals but we expected to get a partially favorable decision from her considering the evidence we had. Nope..... Denied!!!!! This case has been ongoing since 2010 with no resolution. Now what? I appeal since she blatantly left information out and this is an error in law? Appeal and another 2 to 3 years with no benefits? Reapply? Lose all back pay and 1 1/2 years more no benefits? This is a nightmare I can't wake up from!!!' When a judge abuses power and gets the "I Am God, Doctor and shrink rolled up all in one" complex..it spells bad news for claimants desperately needing benefits. My lawyer's advice? Move...move far away from this North Phoenix Office!!!! Lawyers are turning down cases now from claimants who have a hearing scheduled here because they can't win and they can't work for free.
After a 5x heart bypass in 2010 that has left me week and a tumor removed from my spinal cord in 2012 leaving a indent, loss of signal, numbness in legs, unable to be on my feet for 15 minutes and peridural fibroses in my lower back she said I am ok to work. Nevermind needing sleep 2-3 times a day, 6 meds for heart and diabeties, 2 for pain. Even the expert she had at the hearing said their was no work I could perform she herself came up with 4, one being "assembly work". This week I find out if the arteries in my neck needs to be done, at the time of the hearing they were L62%, R74% blocked and waiting to be cleared for another surgery. All this was documented at the hearing, MRI, surgical reports, rehab and not challenged by her. She is in over her head, her denial letter excluded testimony, medical reports even included a paragraph from another case about a lady, come on Bucci, I am a guy, if you are making things up at least get the gender and ailments right its more believable...
After a 5x heart bypass in 2010 that has left me week and a tumor removed from my spinal cord in 2012 leaving a indent, loss of signal, numbness in legs, unable to be on my feet for 15 minutes and peridural fibroses in my lower back she said I am ok to work. Nevermind needing sleep 2-3 times a day, 6 meds for heart and diabeties, 2 for pain. Even the expert she had at the hearing said their was no work I could perform she herself came up with 4, one being "assembly work". This week I find out if the arteries in my neck needs to be done, at the time of the hearing they were L62%, R74% blocked and waiting to be cleared for another surgery. All this was documented at the hearing, MRI, surgical reports, rehab and not challenged by her. She is in over her head, her denial letter excluded testimony, medical reports even included a paragraph from another case about a lady, come on Bucci, I am a guy, if you are making things up at least get the gender and ailments right its more believable...
After a 5x heart bypass in 2010 that has left me week and a tumor removed from my spinal cord in 2012 leaving a indent, loss of signal, numbness in legs, unable to be on my feet for 15 minutes and peridural fibroses in my lower back she said I am ok to work. Nevermind needing sleep 2-3 times a day, 6 meds for heart and diabeties, 2 for pain. Even the expert she had at the hearing said their was no work I could perform she herself came up with 4, one being "assembly work". This week I find out if the arteries in my neck needs to be done, at the time of the hearing they were L62%, R74% blocked and waiting to be cleared for another surgery. All this was documented at the hearing, MRI, surgical reports, rehab and not challenged by her. She is in over her head, her denial letter excluded testimony, medical reports even included a paragraph from another case about a lady, come on Bucci, I am a guy, if you are making things up at least get the gender and ailments right its more believable...
Judge Bucci has every right to deny someone. I was denied and that is totally fine, like I said it is her job. What I don't like is in her letter she insults you, calls you a liar, tells you that the letters from Dr's don't mean anything. Judge Bucci gives no weight to VA evaluations of people, as she stated in other words in my letter, but yet relied on them enough that SSA never sent me for an evaluation with one of their Dr's. She insults the VA evaluaters who are just doing their job but relied on the opinion of the state medical Dr. who has never seen me or evaluated me (she contradicts herself constantly). I guess the VA has no weight because they didn't state what she thought they should have, what would they know they are just Dr's. Judge Bucci is an insecure, hateful, hag who should be seen for mental issues herself. Like I said it's not the denial of the benefits it's the personal insults within her letter. She needs to be removed from the bench she is far from impartial she needs to understand people in pain use drugs that how we are treated. She never considers that maybe the Dr. who wrote those comments where covering up for the fact that he was the one who proscribed the over dosage leading to the medication addiction. Oops, did I put somebody who never used narcotics before on a larger dose of daily Diladid, well it isn't my fault it has to be his better write that down as well. She stated I drove from Oregon and that demonstrated I could sit longer than I claimed but failed to mention that I was in the ER almost immediately within my arrival in Arizona and had a suicide attempt shortly after. I think those are important facts don't you. She fails to mention the multiple surgeries I have now had on my backs which the Dr's felt needed surgery and pain control. I have had 4 back surgeries, a suicide attempt, I have sleep apnea which has been confirmed by a sleep study, I have had PE's, I'm on blood thinners, I have a GAF Score of 45, I have been diagnosed with Asthma, I have been diagnosed with chronic pain by a professional psychologist who specializes in pain (what does she want)! She manipulates her letters and only points to facts that support how she feels about you as a person and not the medical facts and issues at hand. All I can say is Ma'am, I might be in pain and might have some issues but I'm sure glad I'm not as miserable and hateful as you are. I'm sorry to see that anybody would put you in any position of judgement because you are a clear and concise example of why there isn't any justice in this country anymore and I'm sure your closet has all kinds of dirty little secrets. I'm glad you denied me as I don't want to be in a system with this type of professionalism. I hope you have a miserable life and know your probably hated by all that know you! I don't mean to get off on the facts of the case, it's not that she denied me benefits, it's that she insulted me as a person, manipulated her letter, and called me liar even though a Dr. confirmed the diagnosis. If you get her don't count on getting benefits.
Judge Bucci has every right to deny someone. I was denied and that is totally fine, like I said it is her job. What I don't like is in her letter she insults you, calls you a liar, tells you that the letters from Dr's don't mean anything. Judge Bucci gives no weight to VA evaluations of people, as she stated in other words in my letter, but yet relied on them enough that SSA never sent me for an evaluation with one of their Dr's. She insults the VA evaluaters who are just doing their job but relied on the opinion of the state medical Dr. who has never seen me or evaluated me (she contradicts herself constantly). I guess the VA has no weight because they didn't state what she thought they should have, what would they know they are just Dr's. Judge Bucci is an insecure, hateful, hag who should be seen for mental issues herself. Like I said it's not the denial of the benefits it's the personal insults within her letter. She needs to be removed from the bench she is far from impartial she needs to understand people in pain use drugs that how we are treated. She never considers that maybe the Dr. who wrote those comments where covering up for the fact that he was the one who proscribed the over dosage leading to the medication addiction. Oops, did I put somebody who never used narcotics before on a larger dose of daily Diladid, well it isn't my fault it has to be his better write that down as well. She stated I drove from Oregon and that demonstrated I could sit longer than I claimed but failed to mention that I was in the ER almost immediately within my arrival in Arizona and had a suicide attempt shortly after. I think those are important facts don't you. She fails to mention the multiple surgeries I have now had on my backs which the Dr's felt needed surgery and pain control. I have had 4 back surgeries, a suicide attempt, I have sleep apnea which has been confirmed by a sleep study, I have had PE's, I'm on blood thinners, I have a GAF Score of 45, I have been diagnosed with Asthma, I have been diagnosed with chronic pain by a professional psychologist who specializes in pain (what does she want)! She manipulates her letters and only points to facts that support how she feels about you as a person and not the medical facts and issues at hand. All I can say is Ma'am, I might be in pain and might have some issues but I'm sure glad I'm not as miserable and hateful as you are. I'm sorry to see that anybody would put you in any position of judgement because you are a clear and concise example of why there isn't any justice in this country anymore and I'm sure your closet has all kinds of dirty little secrets. I'm glad you denied me as I don't want to be in a system with this type of professionalism. I hope you have a miserable life and know your probably hated by all that know you! I don't mean to get off on the facts of the case, it's not that she denied me benefits, it's that she insulted me as a person, manipulated her letter, and called me liar even though a Dr. confirmed the diagnosis. If you get her don't count on getting benefits.
Judge Bucci has every right to deny someone. I was denied and that is totally fine, like I said it is her job. What I don't like is in her letter she insults you, calls you a liar, tells you that the letters from Dr's don't mean anything. Judge Bucci gives no weight to VA evaluations of people, as she stated in other words in my letter, but yet relied on them enough that SSA never sent me for an evaluation with one of their Dr's. She insults the VA evaluaters who are just doing their job but relied on the opinion of the state medical Dr. who has never seen me or evaluated me (she contradicts herself constantly). I guess the VA has no weight because they didn't state what she thought they should have, what would they know they are just Dr's. Judge Bucci is an insecure, hateful, hag who should be seen for mental issues herself. Like I said it's not the denial of the benefits it's the personal insults within her letter. She needs to be removed from the bench she is far from impartial she needs to understand people in pain use drugs that how we are treated. She never considers that maybe the Dr. who wrote those comments where covering up for the fact that he was the one who proscribed the over dosage leading to the medication addiction. Oops, did I put somebody who never used narcotics before on a larger dose of daily Diladid, well it isn't my fault it has to be his better write that down as well. She stated I drove from Oregon and that demonstrated I could sit longer than I claimed but failed to mention that I was in the ER almost immediately within my arrival in Arizona and had a suicide attempt shortly after. I think those are important facts don't you. She fails to mention the multiple surgeries I have now had on my backs which the Dr's felt needed surgery and pain control. I have had 4 back surgeries, a suicide attempt, I have sleep apnea which has been confirmed by a sleep study, I have had PE's, I'm on blood thinners, I have a GAF Score of 45, I have been diagnosed with Asthma, I have been diagnosed with chronic pain by a professional psychologist who specializes in pain (what does she want)! She manipulates her letters and only points to facts that support how she feels about you as a person and not the medical facts and issues at hand. All I can say is Ma'am, I might be in pain and might have some issues but I'm sure glad I'm not as miserable and hateful as you are. I'm sorry to see that anybody would put you in any position of judgement because you are a clear and concise example of why there isn't any justice in this country anymore and I'm sure your closet has all kinds of dirty little secrets. I'm glad you denied me as I don't want to be in a system with this type of professionalism. I hope you have a miserable life and know your probably hated by all that know you! I don't mean to get off on the facts of the case, it's not that she denied me benefits, it's that she insulted me as a person, manipulated her letter, and called me liar even though a Dr. confirmed the diagnosis. If you get her don't count on getting benefits.
A bitter judge, you can tell in every paragraph of her denial. I think she belongs in Chicago not Phoenix just her tone and misrepresentation in her decisions says alote about her frame of mind. Do these judges have medical or law backgroundg or are they appointed. I do know this my decline by her states I have 2 major ailments she could not argue against but was still declined with 4 jobs listed. Why is she so bitter, might be the heat or good old fashon not knowing her job.
A bitter judge, you can tell in every paragraph of her denial. I think she belongs in Chicago not Phoenix just her tone and misrepresentation in her decisions says alote about her frame of mind. Do these judges have medical or law backgroundg or are they appointed. I do know this my decline by her states I have 2 major ailments she could not argue against but was still declined with 4 jobs listed. Why is she so bitter, might be the heat or good old fashon not knowing her job.
A bitter judge, you can tell in every paragraph of her denial. I think she belongs in Chicago not Phoenix just her tone and misrepresentation in her decisions says alote about her frame of mind. Do these judges have medical or law backgroundg or are they appointed. I do know this my decline by her states I have 2 major ailments she could not argue against but was still declined with 4 jobs listed. Why is she so bitter, might be the heat or good old fashon not knowing her job.
Well it's been 8 months since I filed another appeal against Judge Bucci and have not even heard anything back on if it was received. I have been denied twice by this judge even though we won on a remand and got her decision overturned in 03/2012. They sent me back to Judge Bucci again who was obviously peeved we overturned her decision the first time. Why would they send you back to the same judge who denied you already? I am convinced judge Bucci has a vendetta against me for making her look bad on the appeal overturn. She is a bitter biased woman who needs to leave our state!!! I am so disgusted on this entire matter I can't even put my disgust unto words. 5 years I have been waiting for benefits while a I see people all around me get it for stupid stuff and I am far more disabled than they are. This system is so biased and unfair. I worked and pain into SSD for 30 years making 50 k a year. I can't work full time now and never will again. Why am I being penalized? Because Judge Bucci judgmentaland is a very biased judge!
Well it's been 8 months since I filed another appeal against Judge Bucci and have not even heard anything back on if it was received. I have been denied twice by this judge even though we won on a remand and got her decision overturned in 03/2012. They sent me back to Judge Bucci again who was obviously peeved we overturned her decision the first time. Why would they send you back to the same judge who denied you already? I am convinced judge Bucci has a vendetta against me for making her look bad on the appeal overturn. She is a bitter biased woman who needs to leave our state!!! I am so disgusted on this entire matter I can't even put my disgust unto words. 5 years I have been waiting for benefits while a I see people all around me get it for stupid stuff and I am far more disabled than they are. This system is so biased and unfair. I worked and pain into SSD for 30 years making 50 k a year. I can't work full time now and never will again. Why am I being penalized? Because Judge Bucci judgmentaland is a very biased judge!
Well it's been 8 months since I filed another appeal against Judge Bucci and have not even heard anything back on if it was received. I have been denied twice by this judge even though we won on a remand and got her decision overturned in 03/2012. They sent me back to Judge Bucci again who was obviously peeved we overturned her decision the first time. Why would they send you back to the same judge who denied you already? I am convinced judge Bucci has a vendetta against me for making her look bad on the appeal overturn. She is a bitter biased woman who needs to leave our state!!! I am so disgusted on this entire matter I can't even put my disgust unto words. 5 years I have been waiting for benefits while a I see people all around me get it for stupid stuff and I am far more disabled than they are. This system is so biased and unfair. I worked and pain into SSD for 30 years making 50 k a year. I can't work full time now and never will again. Why am I being penalized? Because Judge Bucci judgmentaland is a very biased judge!
Their is a judge in New York that has the same type of approval rate as Bucci. That judge is now being sued for biased oppinions. At a rate of only 25% approval they are finding certain ALJ are only approving people connected to certain attorneys (payoffs?). So maybe it's time to find out Buccis reasoning and make her explain herself to a court herself . If you have worked 20-50 years of your life you've paid your dues. I've never went to a judge for a biopsy or operation so why are they making the decisions i would think a medical review board of actual Dr's would be the better option to determine a persons disability. Oh and by the way Social Security gives ALJ a 2 month time period to make a decision Bucci seems to think that does not apply to her. If you contact SS they will contact the judge and tell her/him to make a decision. people who lived worked paid taxes should not be going homeless for 5-10 years while the system drags out the process. It's very obvious they are just waiting for us to die so they don't have to pay.
Their is a judge in New York that has the same type of approval rate as Bucci. That judge is now being sued for biased oppinions. At a rate of only 25% approval they are finding certain ALJ are only approving people connected to certain attorneys (payoffs?). So maybe it's time to find out Buccis reasoning and make her explain herself to a court herself . If you have worked 20-50 years of your life you've paid your dues. I've never went to a judge for a biopsy or operation so why are they making the decisions i would think a medical review board of actual Dr's would be the better option to determine a persons disability. Oh and by the way Social Security gives ALJ a 2 month time period to make a decision Bucci seems to think that does not apply to her. If you contact SS they will contact the judge and tell her/him to make a decision. people who lived worked paid taxes should not be going homeless for 5-10 years while the system drags out the process. It's very obvious they are just waiting for us to die so they don't have to pay.
Their is a judge in New York that has the same type of approval rate as Bucci. That judge is now being sued for biased oppinions. At a rate of only 25% approval they are finding certain ALJ are only approving people connected to certain attorneys (payoffs?). So maybe it's time to find out Buccis reasoning and make her explain herself to a court herself . If you have worked 20-50 years of your life you've paid your dues. I've never went to a judge for a biopsy or operation so why are they making the decisions i would think a medical review board of actual Dr's would be the better option to determine a persons disability. Oh and by the way Social Security gives ALJ a 2 month time period to make a decision Bucci seems to think that does not apply to her. If you contact SS they will contact the judge and tell her/him to make a decision. people who lived worked paid taxes should not be going homeless for 5-10 years while the system drags out the process. It's very obvious they are just waiting for us to die so they don't have to pay.
I think it is high time that we stop Patricia Bucci from bullying all of us around.
I think it is high time that we stop Patricia Bucci from bullying all of us around.
I think it is high time that we stop Patricia Bucci from bullying all of us around.
If you need help filing a complaint you can call 202-502-2600. They will help you step by step. The north phoenix office will not let you file a complaint if you have filed an appeal. They seem to think that the appeal is a complaint and they are no help at all.
If you need help filing a complaint you can call 202-502-2600. They will help you step by step. The north phoenix office will not let you file a complaint if you have filed an appeal. They seem to think that the appeal is a complaint and they are no help at all.
If you need help filing a complaint you can call 202-502-2600. They will help you step by step. The north phoenix office will not let you file a complaint if you have filed an appeal. They seem to think that the appeal is a complaint and they are no help at all.
Judge Bucci is nothing shy if ignorant..I am disgusted by her inability to actually read meducal reports. She needs to be permanently fired.
Judge Bucci is nothing shy if ignorant..I am disgusted by her inability to actually read meducal reports. She needs to be permanently fired.
Judge Bucci is nothing shy if ignorant..I am disgusted by her inability to actually read meducal reports. She needs to be permanently fired.
I don't like being called a liar and a like it even less when my spouse is called a liar. Yet that is the strong implication in Madam Buccis written decision on my spouses case. I am too close to my spouse for anything that I say to be considered in the case according to this so called judge. She picked out the medical opinions that she wanted and totally dismissed others. Overwhelming evidence is irrelevant if there is just one differing opinion so the one opinion is chosen over the collective because it is the desired opinion. That seems to be this government employees methodology. Madam Bucci had no clue regarding my spouses medical issues although the conditions are clearly explained in the medical reports the Madam received. If only there was some way that Madam Bucci could experience the pain and frustration that she has wrought... My only comfort is that statistically most Americans experience a devastating illness at some point in their lives. I hope that when she finally does that she will receive understanding similar to her judgments and that people treat her with the same incredulity and insult as she has treated others.
I don't like being called a liar and a like it even less when my spouse is called a liar. Yet that is the strong implication in Madam Buccis written decision on my spouses case. I am too close to my spouse for anything that I say to be considered in the case according to this so called judge. She picked out the medical opinions that she wanted and totally dismissed others. Overwhelming evidence is irrelevant if there is just one differing opinion so the one opinion is chosen over the collective because it is the desired opinion. That seems to be this government employees methodology. Madam Bucci had no clue regarding my spouses medical issues although the conditions are clearly explained in the medical reports the Madam received. If only there was some way that Madam Bucci could experience the pain and frustration that she has wrought... My only comfort is that statistically most Americans experience a devastating illness at some point in their lives. I hope that when she finally does that she will receive understanding similar to her judgments and that people treat her with the same incredulity and insult as she has treated others.
I don't like being called a liar and a like it even less when my spouse is called a liar. Yet that is the strong implication in Madam Buccis written decision on my spouses case. I am too close to my spouse for anything that I say to be considered in the case according to this so called judge. She picked out the medical opinions that she wanted and totally dismissed others. Overwhelming evidence is irrelevant if there is just one differing opinion so the one opinion is chosen over the collective because it is the desired opinion. That seems to be this government employees methodology. Madam Bucci had no clue regarding my spouses medical issues although the conditions are clearly explained in the medical reports the Madam received. If only there was some way that Madam Bucci could experience the pain and frustration that she has wrought... My only comfort is that statistically most Americans experience a devastating illness at some point in their lives. I hope that when she finally does that she will receive understanding similar to her judgments and that people treat her with the same incredulity and insult as she has treated others.
The System is broken if you are not disable you will likely get it folks that are truly disable and need it typically do not get it these Judges are not Medical Professionals but they get to decide if you will be approved I had a hearing with Pactrica Bucci she is the worst Judge in Phoenix you pretty much got to be bed ridden with a few months to live before this Judge will approve you. I waited 3 years to get a slap in the face. I am 50 years old with Herniated Disk, Anxiety. Depression with Psychotic Features they put me through so much going to several of their Doctors test after test after test to no avail I even had to go to another one of their Doctors after the Hearing it is simply a Ponzi Scheme I worked all of my life the Government took money out of my weekly check which Money I will never see again My advice is if your are filing for disability and you are in North Phoenix area MOVE!!!to a different part of the Valley try to get in the Phoenix Area you will be a lot better off look at some of the others Judges approval rates Bucci has a 21% approval rate simply impossible to win...
The System is broken if you are not disable you will likely get it folks that are truly disable and need it typically do not get it these Judges are not Medical Professionals but they get to decide if you will be approved I had a hearing with Pactrica Bucci she is the worst Judge in Phoenix you pretty much got to be bed ridden with a few months to live before this Judge will approve you. I waited 3 years to get a slap in the face. I am 50 years old with Herniated Disk, Anxiety. Depression with Psychotic Features they put me through so much going to several of their Doctors test after test after test to no avail I even had to go to another one of their Doctors after the Hearing it is simply a Ponzi Scheme I worked all of my life the Government took money out of my weekly check which Money I will never see again My advice is if your are filing for disability and you are in North Phoenix area MOVE!!!to a different part of the Valley try to get in the Phoenix Area you will be a lot better off look at some of the others Judges approval rates Bucci has a 21% approval rate simply impossible to win...
The System is broken if you are not disable you will likely get it folks that are truly disable and need it typically do not get it these Judges are not Medical Professionals but they get to decide if you will be approved I had a hearing with Pactrica Bucci she is the worst Judge in Phoenix you pretty much got to be bed ridden with a few months to live before this Judge will approve you. I waited 3 years to get a slap in the face. I am 50 years old with Herniated Disk, Anxiety. Depression with Psychotic Features they put me through so much going to several of their Doctors test after test after test to no avail I even had to go to another one of their Doctors after the Hearing it is simply a Ponzi Scheme I worked all of my life the Government took money out of my weekly check which Money I will never see again My advice is if your are filing for disability and you are in North Phoenix area MOVE!!!to a different part of the Valley try to get in the Phoenix Area you will be a lot better off look at some of the others Judges approval rates Bucci has a 21% approval rate simply impossible to win...
Having just received my letter of Denial from Judge Bucci and reading the previous statements, I just want to throw my hands up and shake my head. Everything that everyone has written is right on target and exactly what she said about myself, my husband, my doctors. Yes, she called us all liars. The woman is a nut case. Guess, I will be talking with my attorney on Monday! Not sure if this is an elected position or not, but this broad needs to go!!!!
Having just received my letter of Denial from Judge Bucci and reading the previous statements, I just want to throw my hands up and shake my head. Everything that everyone has written is right on target and exactly what she said about myself, my husband, my doctors. Yes, she called us all liars. The woman is a nut case. Guess, I will be talking with my attorney on Monday! Not sure if this is an elected position or not, but this broad needs to go!!!!
Having just received my letter of Denial from Judge Bucci and reading the previous statements, I just want to throw my hands up and shake my head. Everything that everyone has written is right on target and exactly what she said about myself, my husband, my doctors. Yes, she called us all liars. The woman is a nut case. Guess, I will be talking with my attorney on Monday! Not sure if this is an elected position or not, but this broad needs to go!!!!
The worst judge for this job. Biased and does not believe a word anyone says.
The worst judge for this job. Biased and does not believe a word anyone says.
The worst judge for this job. Biased and does not believe a word anyone says.
PHOENIX NORTH OADR OFFICE IS FALSIFYING THE MEDICAL EVIDENCE THAT I SUBMIT.
PHOENIX NORTH OADR OFFICE IS FALSIFYING THE MEDICAL EVIDENCE THAT I SUBMIT.
PHOENIX NORTH OADR OFFICE IS FALSIFYING THE MEDICAL EVIDENCE THAT I SUBMIT.
NO STARS AND TEN ***** UP to this *********! Today is Thanksgiving in the USA this *****, Should have NOTHING TO BE THANKFUL FOR. She is a TRAITOR to the US and is RACIST - CHECK HER STATS FOLKS. 33.3 % APPROVAL in Phoenix? Yes Phoenix = 33 % Hispanic (w/undocs.) BUCCI is a MURDERER AND Responsible for MANY DEATHS OF SOLDIERS! Look at the rates of suicide because she wouldn't help those Americans that came for her help. Her NON Ethical staff is JUST AS RESPONSIBLE. Hope your bonuses were enough to overcome your time in ****. These ************ keep changing the facts after you are out of the courthouses and do ALL they can to keep their money to shove us these ************** MURDEROUS ACCOMPLICEASSES. I / we have lost FAR too many because of these PUTRID MOST UNETHICAL IN HISTORY ****! I hope your grand kids know what you are Patricia A BUCCI KILLER OF AMERICAN SOLDIERS AND THERE FAMILIES. Your actions have caused family members OF SOLDIERS to take their lives too. FEDS Don't want you to know people! 33.3 % APPROVAL Seriously? Why is she in Office? >> 66.6 disapproval - *****! *****'* **.
NO STARS AND TEN ***** UP to this *********! Today is Thanksgiving in the USA this *****, Should have NOTHING TO BE THANKFUL FOR. She is a TRAITOR to the US and is RACIST - CHECK HER STATS FOLKS. 33.3 % APPROVAL in Phoenix? Yes Phoenix = 33 % Hispanic (w/undocs.) BUCCI is a MURDERER AND Responsible for MANY DEATHS OF SOLDIERS! Look at the rates of suicide because she wouldn't help those Americans that came for her help. Her NON Ethical staff is JUST AS RESPONSIBLE. Hope your bonuses were enough to overcome your time in ****. These ************ keep changing the facts after you are out of the courthouses and do ALL they can to keep their money to shove us these ************** MURDEROUS ACCOMPLICEASSES. I / we have lost FAR too many because of these PUTRID MOST UNETHICAL IN HISTORY ****! I hope your grand kids know what you are Patricia A BUCCI KILLER OF AMERICAN SOLDIERS AND THERE FAMILIES. Your actions have caused family members OF SOLDIERS to take their lives too. FEDS Don't want you to know people! 33.3 % APPROVAL Seriously? Why is she in Office? >> 66.6 disapproval - *****! *****'* **.
NO STARS AND TEN ***** UP to this *********! Today is Thanksgiving in the USA this *****, Should have NOTHING TO BE THANKFUL FOR. She is a TRAITOR to the US and is RACIST - CHECK HER STATS FOLKS. 33.3 % APPROVAL in Phoenix? Yes Phoenix = 33 % Hispanic (w/undocs.) BUCCI is a MURDERER AND Responsible for MANY DEATHS OF SOLDIERS! Look at the rates of suicide because she wouldn't help those Americans that came for her help. Her NON Ethical staff is JUST AS RESPONSIBLE. Hope your bonuses were enough to overcome your time in ****. These ************ keep changing the facts after you are out of the courthouses and do ALL they can to keep their money to shove us these ************** MURDEROUS ACCOMPLICEASSES. I / we have lost FAR too many because of these PUTRID MOST UNETHICAL IN HISTORY ****! I hope your grand kids know what you are Patricia A BUCCI KILLER OF AMERICAN SOLDIERS AND THERE FAMILIES. Your actions have caused family members OF SOLDIERS to take their lives too. FEDS Don't want you to know people! 33.3 % APPROVAL Seriously? Why is she in Office? >> 66.6 disapproval - *****! *****'* **.
So I guess sending Patricia Bucci to sensitivity training did nothing for her attitude overall. Too bad there's nothing anybody can do to get her off of the bench because she is a menace. She does not care what your doctor say about you or what your diagnosis is period. She Makes Her determination with her biased puss face And could care less what's happening in anybody else's lives but her own. She is not qualified for this job and whoever thought she would be really needs to look themselves in the mirror. You have to have a heart along with common sense and I know she has neither. I recommend if you draw judge Patricia Bucci as your ALJ That you stopped everything and start over and reapply and hopefully you'll get a different judge.
So I guess sending Patricia Bucci to sensitivity training did nothing for her attitude overall. Too bad there's nothing anybody can do to get her off of the bench because she is a menace. She does not care what your doctor say about you or what your diagnosis is period. She Makes Her determination with her biased puss face And could care less what's happening in anybody else's lives but her own. She is not qualified for this job and whoever thought she would be really needs to look themselves in the mirror. You have to have a heart along with common sense and I know she has neither. I recommend if you draw judge Patricia Bucci as your ALJ That you stopped everything and start over and reapply and hopefully you'll get a different judge.
So I guess sending Patricia Bucci to sensitivity training did nothing for her attitude overall. Too bad there's nothing anybody can do to get her off of the bench because she is a menace. She does not care what your doctor say about you or what your diagnosis is period. She Makes Her determination with her biased puss face And could care less what's happening in anybody else's lives but her own. She is not qualified for this job and whoever thought she would be really needs to look themselves in the mirror. You have to have a heart along with common sense and I know she has neither. I recommend if you draw judge Patricia Bucci as your ALJ That you stopped everything and start over and reapply and hopefully you'll get a different judge.
So I guess sending her to sensitivity training did nothing for her attitude overall. Too bad there's nothing anybody can do to get her off of the bench because she is a menace. She does not care what your doctor say about you or what your diagnosis is period. She Makes Her determination with her biased puss face And could care less what's happening in anybody else's lives but her own. She is not qualified for this job and whoever thought she would be really needs to look themselves in the mirror. You have to have a heart along with common sense and I know she has neither. I recommend if you draw her as your ALJ That you stopped everything and start over and reapply and hopefully you'll get a different judge.
So I guess sending her to sensitivity training did nothing for her attitude overall. Too bad there's nothing anybody can do to get her off of the bench because she is a menace. She does not care what your doctor say about you or what your diagnosis is period. She Makes Her determination with her biased puss face And could care less what's happening in anybody else's lives but her own. She is not qualified for this job and whoever thought she would be really needs to look themselves in the mirror. You have to have a heart along with common sense and I know she has neither. I recommend if you draw her as your ALJ That you stopped everything and start over and reapply and hopefully you'll get a different judge.
So I guess sending her to sensitivity training did nothing for her attitude overall. Too bad there's nothing anybody can do to get her off of the bench because she is a menace. She does not care what your doctor say about you or what your diagnosis is period. She Makes Her determination with her biased puss face And could care less what's happening in anybody else's lives but her own. She is not qualified for this job and whoever thought she would be really needs to look themselves in the mirror. You have to have a heart along with common sense and I know she has neither. I recommend if you draw her as your ALJ That you stopped everything and start over and reapply and hopefully you'll get a different judge.
she is a bias ***** ***** ******* hair doe ***** who should *** ** ****** *** *****
she is a bias ***** ***** ******* hair doe ***** who should *** ** ****** *** *****
she is a bias ***** ***** ******* hair doe ***** who should *** ** ****** *** *****
I don't think she was fair, and in my case she didn't read or state my second surgery correctly. I heard from a Attorney that she was a horrible Judge, and how they worked with this client that eventually got on disability, but she had denied them. I don't know what to do right now for myself! But for you all don't give up, sometimes it takes a few denials, but some people eventually will get approved. Also make sure you have a good Attorney that will make a difference. I didn't have good help.
I don't think she was fair, and in my case she didn't read or state my second surgery correctly. I heard from a Attorney that she was a horrible Judge, and how they worked with this client that eventually got on disability, but she had denied them. I don't know what to do right now for myself! But for you all don't give up, sometimes it takes a few denials, but some people eventually will get approved. Also make sure you have a good Attorney that will make a difference. I didn't have good help.
I don't think she was fair, and in my case she didn't read or state my second surgery correctly. I heard from a Attorney that she was a horrible Judge, and how they worked with this client that eventually got on disability, but she had denied them. I don't know what to do right now for myself! But for you all don't give up, sometimes it takes a few denials, but some people eventually will get approved. Also make sure you have a good Attorney that will make a difference. I didn't have good help.
My name is Cheryl Brown and my husband was approved for his Social Security this judge, he however passed away on December 31st 2018 and was expecting his money on January 16th 2019 I am his wife and I understand that I cannot collect his monthly payment but there is a substantial sum for back payments that we had borrowed against for the past 3 years I have called everybody and I'm hoping you see this post and we'll get a hold of me I'm staying with my daughter Bernadette at 1913 East encinas Lane Phoenix Arizona you can also reach me at 602-596-9681 I hope to hear from you I'm at just for the aliens and I'll give you an all ratings up thumbs up by the way
My name is Cheryl Brown and my husband was approved for his Social Security this judge, he however passed away on December 31st 2018 and was expecting his money on January 16th 2019 I am his wife and I understand that I cannot collect his monthly payment but there is a substantial sum for back payments that we had borrowed against for the past 3 years I have called everybody and I'm hoping you see this post and we'll get a hold of me I'm staying with my daughter Bernadette at 1913 East encinas Lane Phoenix Arizona you can also reach me at 602-596-9681 I hope to hear from you I'm at just for the aliens and I'll give you an all ratings up thumbs up by the way
My name is Cheryl Brown and my husband was approved for his Social Security this judge, he however passed away on December 31st 2018 and was expecting his money on January 16th 2019 I am his wife and I understand that I cannot collect his monthly payment but there is a substantial sum for back payments that we had borrowed against for the past 3 years I have called everybody and I'm hoping you see this post and we'll get a hold of me I'm staying with my daughter Bernadette at 1913 East encinas Lane Phoenix Arizona you can also reach me at 602-596-9681 I hope to hear from you I'm at just for the aliens and I'll give you an all ratings up thumbs up by the way
if you want to win with ALJ Gonzalez: 1. have a 3rd party statement 2. have your attorney draft a pre hearing brief 3. have at least one treating physician give a supportive opinion 4. have consistent treating medical records 5. avoid drugs and/or alcohol
if you want to win with ALJ Gonzalez: 1. have a 3rd party statement 2. have your attorney draft a pre hearing brief 3. have at least one treating physician give a supportive opinion 4. have consistent treating medical records 5. avoid drugs and/or alcohol
if you want to win with ALJ Gonzalez: 1. have a 3rd party statement 2. have your attorney draft a pre hearing brief 3. have at least one treating physician give a supportive opinion 4. have consistent treating medical records 5. avoid drugs and/or alcohol
This man far exceeded any expectationsI had in regard to attending this hearing and accomplishing a solution. He is the first person to really listen to my case, not interrupt me, not act in an unbecoming manner because of his authority, and an individual who showed respect for his fellow person. He was a pleasure to deal with.
This man far exceeded any expectationsI had in regard to attending this hearing and accomplishing a solution. He is the first person to really listen to my case, not interrupt me, not act in an unbecoming manner because of his authority, and an individual who showed respect for his fellow person. He was a pleasure to deal with.
This man far exceeded any expectationsI had in regard to attending this hearing and accomplishing a solution. He is the first person to really listen to my case, not interrupt me, not act in an unbecoming manner because of his authority, and an individual who showed respect for his fellow person. He was a pleasure to deal with.
Nice, understanding, respectful, fair, and knowledgable without prejudice.
Nice, understanding, respectful, fair, and knowledgable without prejudice.
Nice, understanding, respectful, fair, and knowledgable without prejudice.
Judge Alvarez was kind and compassionate. I had a very ifffy case. It could of went either way and at the end of the day he did decide in my favor. I read that he is not big on drugs and alchol. That is very true. But if you are a opiate user, as long as you don't display druggie behavior he was ok. But he did question it. He also relys on 3rd party statements and doctors support. He called on telephone medical expert on both appeal appearances. I truly suggest getting attorneys if you are on appeal. It is not a easy process and its worth paying a attorney to get all the paperwork done. I belive all the statistics I have read about him. My attorney said allot of cases get audited and that's why he makes sure that his decisions are nedically backed up.
Judge Alvarez was kind and compassionate. I had a very ifffy case. It could of went either way and at the end of the day he did decide in my favor. I read that he is not big on drugs and alchol. That is very true. But if you are a opiate user, as long as you don't display druggie behavior he was ok. But he did question it. He also relys on 3rd party statements and doctors support. He called on telephone medical expert on both appeal appearances. I truly suggest getting attorneys if you are on appeal. It is not a easy process and its worth paying a attorney to get all the paperwork done. I belive all the statistics I have read about him. My attorney said allot of cases get audited and that's why he makes sure that his decisions are nedically backed up.
Judge Alvarez was kind and compassionate. I had a very ifffy case. It could of went either way and at the end of the day he did decide in my favor. I read that he is not big on drugs and alchol. That is very true. But if you are a opiate user, as long as you don't display druggie behavior he was ok. But he did question it. He also relys on 3rd party statements and doctors support. He called on telephone medical expert on both appeal appearances. I truly suggest getting attorneys if you are on appeal. It is not a easy process and its worth paying a attorney to get all the paperwork done. I belive all the statistics I have read about him. My attorney said allot of cases get audited and that's why he makes sure that his decisions are nedically backed up.
Judge Hong was friendly and personable during my hearing in October; hoping to hear her decision soon!
Judge Hong was friendly and personable during my hearing in October; hoping to hear her decision soon!
Judge Hong was friendly and personable during my hearing in October; hoping to hear her decision soon!
Had my hearing in Jan, 2016! Judge Hong was very nice and easy to talk with, I thought I would have time to meet with my lawyer but it didn't happen. Not her fault! Hope all goes well.
Had my hearing in Jan, 2016! Judge Hong was very nice and easy to talk with, I thought I would have time to meet with my lawyer but it didn't happen. Not her fault! Hope all goes well.
Had my hearing in Jan, 2016! Judge Hong was very nice and easy to talk with, I thought I would have time to meet with my lawyer but it didn't happen. Not her fault! Hope all goes well.
bookmarked!!, I like your blog!
bookmarked!!, I like your blog!
K Kwon made me feel shamefull and embarrassed appying for Social Security. My Dr. said I was disabled and removed me from work, but a judge knows best. I was truthfull and honest in discribing my health condition but she says I'm not credible.
K Kwon made me feel shamefull and embarrassed appying for Social Security. My Dr. said I was disabled and removed me from work, but a judge knows best. I was truthfull and honest in discribing my health condition but she says I'm not credible.
K Kwon made me feel shamefull and embarrassed appying for Social Security. My Dr. said I was disabled and removed me from work, but a judge knows best. I was truthfull and honest in discribing my health condition but she says I'm not credible.
She was nice, easy to talk to and gave me my decision right there that day. She didnt make me wait like I thought and granted my case! I didn't know judges did that. I was so surprised and so relieved after being so nervous and waiting for so long. I am so relieved and glad it's finally over. Thank you for not making me wait one more day.
She was nice, easy to talk to and gave me my decision right there that day. She didnt make me wait like I thought and granted my case! I didn't know judges did that. I was so surprised and so relieved after being so nervous and waiting for so long. I am so relieved and glad it's finally over. Thank you for not making me wait one more day.
She was nice, easy to talk to and gave me my decision right there that day. She didnt make me wait like I thought and granted my case! I didn't know judges did that. I was so surprised and so relieved after being so nervous and waiting for so long. I am so relieved and glad it's finally over. Thank you for not making me wait one more day.
buying viagra online buy viagra online cheap viagra online canadian pharmacy
buying viagra online buy viagra online cheap viagra online canadian pharmacy
Judge Kwon was awful.... she made me feel like I was lying... I just cried and cried after the hearing. I have to say the hearing I had with her was one of the worst experiences of my life...
Judge Kwon was awful.... she made me feel like I was lying... I just cried and cried after the hearing. I have to say the hearing I had with her was one of the worst experiences of my life...
Judge marini is a very nice person. I like her. She was my judge in 2017. She approved my case for me. So i thank her very much. She is a good judge.
Judge marini is a very nice person. I like her. She was my judge in 2017. She approved my case for me. So i thank her very much. She is a good judge.
Judge marini is a very nice person. I like her. She was my judge in 2017. She approved my case for me. So i thank her very much. She is a good judge.
Judge Mariani is fair, consistent, and thoughtful. Judge Mariani proved to me why there is an appeal system. I truly do believe she reviewed every piece of evidence and listened to every second of my testimony. If you believe your claim deserves a second look, do not hesitate to appeal. I will be forever grateful for the work Judge Mariani provides. Thanks
Judge Mariani is fair, consistent, and thoughtful. Judge Mariani proved to me why there is an appeal system. I truly do believe she reviewed every piece of evidence and listened to every second of my testimony. If you believe your claim deserves a second look, do not hesitate to appeal. I will be forever grateful for the work Judge Mariani provides. Thanks
Judge Mariani is fair, consistent, and thoughtful. Judge Mariani proved to me why there is an appeal system. I truly do believe she reviewed every piece of evidence and listened to every second of my testimony. If you believe your claim deserves a second look, do not hesitate to appeal. I will be forever grateful for the work Judge Mariani provides. Thanks
When my first hearing was held with the Honorable ALJ Mariani, I never felt like my voice wasn’t being heard. Although I was unsuccessful initially- my case was eventually appealed and remanded for a second hearing with ALJ Mariani. All in all, she re-evaluated every piece of evidence and accepted new critical evidence regarding my capacity and I appreciate that dearly. Her decision clearly reflected her objectivity and explained why or why not she found said evidence persuasive or unpersuasive. I’m sure I’m not the only one who appreciated such. Good luck.
The statistics don't lie. He is by far the most fair and compassionate. His hearings are stress free. He will usually ask most of the questions. You still need to have good medical support. But he is more likely to overlook major deficiencies with your case compared to the other ALJs
The statistics don't lie. He is by far the most fair and compassionate. His hearings are stress free. He will usually ask most of the questions. You still need to have good medical support. But he is more likely to overlook major deficiencies with your case compared to the other ALJs
The statistics don't lie. He is by far the most fair and compassionate. His hearings are stress free. He will usually ask most of the questions. You still need to have good medical support. But he is more likely to overlook major deficiencies with your case compared to the other ALJs
law judge.what happens when mental illness gets worse over time while for ssi to be granted od denied???who and how should i send the special needes leeter to you...if lawyer who was representing me has decided not to at the last minute of the hearing date,how do i go about getting medical records on my own ,,or represent myself on my own behalfe
law judge.what happens when mental illness gets worse over time while for ssi to be granted od denied???who and how should i send the special needes leeter to you...if lawyer who was representing me has decided not to at the last minute of the hearing date,how do i go about getting medical records on my own ,,or represent myself on my own behalfe
law judge.what happens when mental illness gets worse over time while for ssi to be granted od denied???who and how should i send the special needes leeter to you...if lawyer who was representing me has decided not to at the last minute of the hearing date,how do i go about getting medical records on my own ,,or represent myself on my own behalfe
I HAVFE BEEN WAITING ON A DECITION FOR SSI CLAIM SINCE 2008,AND JUST BEEN DENIED BY JUDGE DAVID R. MAZZI...MY CONDITIONED HAS WORSEND AND SUPPLEMENTAL SSI IS ONLY GA AND FOOD STAMPS FOR UP TO A YEAR...I HAVE RECENTLY BEEN EVICTED FROM MY FRIENDS HOUSE WHO I HAVE BEEN RENTING A ROOM FROM PENDING SSI CASE...IM NOW OUT ON THE STREETS OF FAIRFIELD,AND THE ONLY OPTION IS MY PAROLE OFFICER TO SEND ME TO A TREATMENT PROGRAM BECAUSE THEY CLAIM THEY HAVE NO FUNDS FOR A MOTEL ROOM...ONLY POROBLEM IS THAT IM NOT ADDICTED TO ANYTHING(ALCOHOL NOR DRUGS).I HAVE JUMPTED THROUGH EVERY HOPE THAT THEY HAVE TOLD ME TO,AND HAVE BEEN AND STILL ARE TAKING THE PSYCH MEDS THAT THEY GIVE ME.THESE MEDS CAUSE CERTAIN SIDE EFFECTS THAT IM UNABLE TO DESCRIBE,BUT ARE UNSAFE FOR ME TO TAKE WHILE WORKING...SINCERELY,ERVIN S. STEVENS..
I HAVFE BEEN WAITING ON A DECITION FOR SSI CLAIM SINCE 2008,AND JUST BEEN DENIED BY JUDGE DAVID R. MAZZI...MY CONDITIONED HAS WORSEND AND SUPPLEMENTAL SSI IS ONLY GA AND FOOD STAMPS FOR UP TO A YEAR...I HAVE RECENTLY BEEN EVICTED FROM MY FRIENDS HOUSE WHO I HAVE BEEN RENTING A ROOM FROM PENDING SSI CASE...IM NOW OUT ON THE STREETS OF FAIRFIELD,AND THE ONLY OPTION IS MY PAROLE OFFICER TO SEND ME TO A TREATMENT PROGRAM BECAUSE THEY CLAIM THEY HAVE NO FUNDS FOR A MOTEL ROOM...ONLY POROBLEM IS THAT IM NOT ADDICTED TO ANYTHING(ALCOHOL NOR DRUGS).I HAVE JUMPTED THROUGH EVERY HOPE THAT THEY HAVE TOLD ME TO,AND HAVE BEEN AND STILL ARE TAKING THE PSYCH MEDS THAT THEY GIVE ME.THESE MEDS CAUSE CERTAIN SIDE EFFECTS THAT IM UNABLE TO DESCRIBE,BUT ARE UNSAFE FOR ME TO TAKE WHILE WORKING...SINCERELY,ERVIN S. STEVENS..
I HAVFE BEEN WAITING ON A DECITION FOR SSI CLAIM SINCE 2008,AND JUST BEEN DENIED BY JUDGE DAVID R. MAZZI...MY CONDITIONED HAS WORSEND AND SUPPLEMENTAL SSI IS ONLY GA AND FOOD STAMPS FOR UP TO A YEAR...I HAVE RECENTLY BEEN EVICTED FROM MY FRIENDS HOUSE WHO I HAVE BEEN RENTING A ROOM FROM PENDING SSI CASE...IM NOW OUT ON THE STREETS OF FAIRFIELD,AND THE ONLY OPTION IS MY PAROLE OFFICER TO SEND ME TO A TREATMENT PROGRAM BECAUSE THEY CLAIM THEY HAVE NO FUNDS FOR A MOTEL ROOM...ONLY POROBLEM IS THAT IM NOT ADDICTED TO ANYTHING(ALCOHOL NOR DRUGS).I HAVE JUMPTED THROUGH EVERY HOPE THAT THEY HAVE TOLD ME TO,AND HAVE BEEN AND STILL ARE TAKING THE PSYCH MEDS THAT THEY GIVE ME.THESE MEDS CAUSE CERTAIN SIDE EFFECTS THAT IM UNABLE TO DESCRIBE,BUT ARE UNSAFE FOR ME TO TAKE WHILE WORKING...SINCERELY,ERVIN S. STEVENS..
Judge Mazzi is fair and easy going from my experienced. He asked those legitimate questions only regarding my disability. He was nice at all time in the hearing. I felt safe and positive with his decision during and the hearing process. He reviewed my case carefully and I know he made the right decision with my case. Thank You Judge Mazzi you cleared my nightmare and make me wanna live life to the fullest.
Judge Mazzi is fair and easy going from my experienced. He asked those legitimate questions only regarding my disability. He was nice at all time in the hearing. I felt safe and positive with his decision during and the hearing process. He reviewed my case carefully and I know he made the right decision with my case. Thank You Judge Mazzi you cleared my nightmare and make me wanna live life to the fullest.
Judge Mazzi is fair and easy going from my experienced. He asked those legitimate questions only regarding my disability. He was nice at all time in the hearing. I felt safe and positive with his decision during and the hearing process. He reviewed my case carefully and I know he made the right decision with my case. Thank You Judge Mazzi you cleared my nightmare and make me wanna live life to the fullest.
I need your help if you recall Gary Nelson was my ex- lawyer you told me that you was the biggest Creek well guess what he robbed me again everything you said about Gary Nelson ham in the third party
I need your help if you recall Gary Nelson was my ex- lawyer you told me that you was the biggest Creek well guess what he robbed me again everything you said about Gary Nelson ham in the third party
I need your help if you recall Gary Nelson was my ex- lawyer you told me that you was the biggest Creek well guess what he robbed me again everything you said about Gary Nelson ham in the third party
Hi my name is Alfredo Castro I would like to speak to you I am going to give you my daughter's phone number because my phone numbers are being hacked it is important I because in 2012 of June you told me did I was going to receive three large settlements and I have not received not one penny Gary Nelson is the responsible party I am still a victim because of Gary Nelson can you please call my daughter at 209-485-6379
Hi my name is Alfredo Castro I would like to speak to you I am going to give you my daughter's phone number because my phone numbers are being hacked it is important I because in 2012 of June you told me did I was going to receive three large settlements and I have not received not one penny Gary Nelson is the responsible party I am still a victim because of Gary Nelson can you please call my daughter at 209-485-6379
Hi my name is Alfredo Castro I would like to speak to you I am going to give you my daughter's phone number because my phone numbers are being hacked it is important I because in 2012 of June you told me did I was going to receive three large settlements and I have not received not one penny Gary Nelson is the responsible party I am still a victim because of Gary Nelson can you please call my daughter at 209-485-6379
Well it was basically a 25 minute session he asked only 4 questions my lawyer asked the rest he heard me out and he seemed to genuinely understand where I was coming from that was Mar 27th 2017 I didn't hear anything because of the back log in my local office on September 27th he issued his decision it was Thorough to all my medical information and put together in a way that I understood he reminded me of that guy from a commercial THE CREDIT MAN I started singing the tune during he did study my body language I could tell by the facial expression he made He was short with my lawyer though but in his defense I couldn't pay attention I had forgotten to take my meds that morning
Well it was basically a 25 minute session he asked only 4 questions my lawyer asked the rest he heard me out and he seemed to genuinely understand where I was coming from that was Mar 27th 2017 I didn't hear anything because of the back log in my local office on September 27th he issued his decision it was Thorough to all my medical information and put together in a way that I understood he reminded me of that guy from a commercial THE CREDIT MAN I started singing the tune during he did study my body language I could tell by the facial expression he made He was short with my lawyer though but in his defense I couldn't pay attention I had forgotten to take my meds that morning
Well it was basically a 25 minute session he asked only 4 questions my lawyer asked the rest he heard me out and he seemed to genuinely understand where I was coming from that was Mar 27th 2017 I didn't hear anything because of the back log in my local office on September 27th he issued his decision it was Thorough to all my medical information and put together in a way that I understood he reminded me of that guy from a commercial THE CREDIT MAN I started singing the tune during he did study my body language I could tell by the facial expression he made He was short with my lawyer though but in his defense I couldn't pay attention I had forgotten to take my meds that morning
This year I had my hearing with all David R Mazzie and the job specialist and my attorney for nerve damage and spinal stenosis and dds. Alj was very patient and understanding asked me questions regarding my lower back and MRI. And went over every detail of all the steps and asked me how I felt and what types of household can I do how much time etc. it took fro April to o’clock. To be notified of being approved . Thank God I got a good Judge and Job specialist and my attorney that understood my pain and suffering God Bless them all Thank You
This year I had my hearing with all David R Mazzie and the job specialist and my attorney for nerve damage and spinal stenosis and dds. Alj was very patient and understanding asked me questions regarding my lower back and MRI. And went over every detail of all the steps and asked me how I felt and what types of household can I do how much time etc. it took fro April to o’clock. To be notified of being approved . Thank God I got a good Judge and Job specialist and my attorney that understood my pain and suffering God Bless them all Thank You
This year I had my hearing with all David R Mazzie and the job specialist and my attorney for nerve damage and spinal stenosis and dds. Alj was very patient and understanding asked me questions regarding my lower back and MRI. And went over every detail of all the steps and asked me how I felt and what types of household can I do how much time etc. it took fro April to o’clock. To be notified of being approved . Thank God I got a good Judge and Job specialist and my attorney that understood my pain and suffering God Bless them all Thank You
When I went into my hearing with Judge Wynne O'brien Perdons I was happy to hear that I was going before a new judge. I have never in my life been before any type of judge or any law enforcement, so to hear she was new put me a little at ease, since this whole disability world is new to me. God knows, I would much rather be able to work then go through all of the chronic pain and suffering that I go through every single day and every night, as I am sure many other people out there who are truly disabled would agree. Looking back at the day of my hearing I was so nervous I couldn't think straight. For me; It was like going to a doctor and having so many questions for them, and wanting to tell them all of the things that I battled physically during the month, but my mind goes completly blank at that presice moment of course. When leaving my appointment all of the questions I wanted to ask comes back to me like a flood, and I would think to myself "I forgot to tell him/her this or that". Unfortuntely, my case was denied, I think because of my own testimony and other reasons. When my hearing was over and I walked out the door, all of things I wanted to tell her came back like a flood, and all I wanted to do was go back in there and cry out for mercy because the pain I am in all the time, and I know I cant work, but I didn't. After reading her desision all I did was cry for days. I felt her jugement of me was so unfair because things were taken out of content, and I truly have alot of pain, how can chronic pain even be measured? I have worked hard all of my life, until I finally had to admit to myself that I am disabled. This was a very hard thing for me to come to terms with. After reading some of the reviews regarding the other judges, I was glad that I went before Judge Wynne O'brien Persons. Best of luck to all of the people who are truly disabled, but were denied.
When I went into my hearing with Judge Wynne O'brien Perdons I was happy to hear that I was going before a new judge. I have never in my life been before any type of judge or any law enforcement, so to hear she was new put me a little at ease, since this whole disability world is new to me. God knows, I would much rather be able to work then go through all of the chronic pain and suffering that I go through every single day and every night, as I am sure many other people out there who are truly disabled would agree. Looking back at the day of my hearing I was so nervous I couldn't think straight. For me; It was like going to a doctor and having so many questions for them, and wanting to tell them all of the things that I battled physically during the month, but my mind goes completly blank at that presice moment of course. When leaving my appointment all of the questions I wanted to ask comes back to me like a flood, and I would think to myself "I forgot to tell him/her this or that". Unfortuntely, my case was denied, I think because of my own testimony and other reasons. When my hearing was over and I walked out the door, all of things I wanted to tell her came back like a flood, and all I wanted to do was go back in there and cry out for mercy because the pain I am in all the time, and I know I cant work, but I didn't. After reading her desision all I did was cry for days. I felt her jugement of me was so unfair because things were taken out of content, and I truly have alot of pain, how can chronic pain even be measured? I have worked hard all of my life, until I finally had to admit to myself that I am disabled. This was a very hard thing for me to come to terms with. After reading some of the reviews regarding the other judges, I was glad that I went before Judge Wynne O'brien Persons. Best of luck to all of the people who are truly disabled, but were denied.
When I went into my hearing with Judge Wynne O'brien Perdons I was happy to hear that I was going before a new judge. I have never in my life been before any type of judge or any law enforcement, so to hear she was new put me a little at ease, since this whole disability world is new to me. God knows, I would much rather be able to work then go through all of the chronic pain and suffering that I go through every single day and every night, as I am sure many other people out there who are truly disabled would agree. Looking back at the day of my hearing I was so nervous I couldn't think straight. For me; It was like going to a doctor and having so many questions for them, and wanting to tell them all of the things that I battled physically during the month, but my mind goes completly blank at that presice moment of course. When leaving my appointment all of the questions I wanted to ask comes back to me like a flood, and I would think to myself "I forgot to tell him/her this or that". Unfortuntely, my case was denied, I think because of my own testimony and other reasons. When my hearing was over and I walked out the door, all of things I wanted to tell her came back like a flood, and all I wanted to do was go back in there and cry out for mercy because the pain I am in all the time, and I know I cant work, but I didn't. After reading her desision all I did was cry for days. I felt her jugement of me was so unfair because things were taken out of content, and I truly have alot of pain, how can chronic pain even be measured? I have worked hard all of my life, until I finally had to admit to myself that I am disabled. This was a very hard thing for me to come to terms with. After reading some of the reviews regarding the other judges, I was glad that I went before Judge Wynne O'brien Persons. Best of luck to all of the people who are truly disabled, but were denied.
Went before her and got denied, I just don't get it, I can barely walk at all without assistance, I just don't get it....
Went before her and got denied, I just don't get it, I can barely walk at all without assistance, I just don't get it....
Went before her and got denied, I just don't get it, I can barely walk at all without assistance, I just don't get it....
This judge has significantly improved since their move from the Reno to San Rafael office. Demeanor is pleasant, allows for clarifying testimony, follow-ups, additional time to obtain outstanding records, listens carefully to oral arguments, and has upped their grant rate since moving. They are not still a "high-granting" ALJ but certainly the disparity is less severe -- or perhaps the combination of happier environment and greater quality of cases in this region are the controlling factors. Regardless, be professional and prepared for this judge still -- she is the HOCALJ, after all -- and you will have an easy enough time presenting the case. If you have no support, don't bother. If the support isn't consistent with the records, don't bother. If you have a bunch of negative CEs in the record, object timely and cite some regs to support those objections or she'll not take them seriously. Overall, a decent HOCALJ, though you could wish her grant rate was a little higher.
This judge has significantly improved since their move from the Reno to San Rafael office. Demeanor is pleasant, allows for clarifying testimony, follow-ups, additional time to obtain outstanding records, listens carefully to oral arguments, and has upped their grant rate since moving. They are not still a "high-granting" ALJ but certainly the disparity is less severe -- or perhaps the combination of happier environment and greater quality of cases in this region are the controlling factors. Regardless, be professional and prepared for this judge still -- she is the HOCALJ, after all -- and you will have an easy enough time presenting the case. If you have no support, don't bother. If the support isn't consistent with the records, don't bother. If you have a bunch of negative CEs in the record, object timely and cite some regs to support those objections or she'll not take them seriously. Overall, a decent HOCALJ, though you could wish her grant rate was a little higher.
This judge has significantly improved since their move from the Reno to San Rafael office. Demeanor is pleasant, allows for clarifying testimony, follow-ups, additional time to obtain outstanding records, listens carefully to oral arguments, and has upped their grant rate since moving. They are not still a "high-granting" ALJ but certainly the disparity is less severe -- or perhaps the combination of happier environment and greater quality of cases in this region are the controlling factors. Regardless, be professional and prepared for this judge still -- she is the HOCALJ, after all -- and you will have an easy enough time presenting the case. If you have no support, don't bother. If the support isn't consistent with the records, don't bother. If you have a bunch of negative CEs in the record, object timely and cite some regs to support those objections or she'll not take them seriously. Overall, a decent HOCALJ, though you could wish her grant rate was a little higher.
...I forgot to add that she said that there will be a follow up hearing in a year regarding my payee situation. It has been almost two years and no word. I wonder if god just picked them out of a pile and placed them to be best. Hmmm. Maybe even he doesn’t know everything.
...I forgot to add that she said that there will be a follow up hearing in a year regarding my payee situation. It has been almost two years and no word. I wonder if god just picked them out of a pile and placed them to be best. Hmmm. Maybe even he doesn’t know everything.
...I forgot to add that she said that there will be a follow up hearing in a year regarding my payee situation. It has been almost two years and no word. I wonder if god just picked them out of a pile and placed them to be best. Hmmm. Maybe even he doesn’t know everything.
My hearing started out a little on the negative side. One of the first things Judge Mary Beth O'connor said was that i wouldn't be able to look at my book of notes unless it was absolutely necessary in which she would then instruct me to do so. Once we got going, things smoothed out and i was able to tell her my side of the story and she never argued with me or raised her voice. She kept the hearing going at a fast pace and she was very polite to my lawyer. She didn't question or disagree with my doctors opinion, but she did get a second opinion from a neutral Doctor who did agree with my doctor. Overall i am pleased with my hearing. I left uncertain, but i left at least knowing that i got a fair hearing and that i knew she was going to look at all the evidence, and that was good enough for me.
My hearing started out a little on the negative side. One of the first things Judge Mary Beth O'connor said was that i wouldn't be able to look at my book of notes unless it was absolutely necessary in which she would then instruct me to do so. Once we got going, things smoothed out and i was able to tell her my side of the story and she never argued with me or raised her voice. She kept the hearing going at a fast pace and she was very polite to my lawyer. She didn't question or disagree with my doctors opinion, but she did get a second opinion from a neutral Doctor who did agree with my doctor. Overall i am pleased with my hearing. I left uncertain, but i left at least knowing that i got a fair hearing and that i knew she was going to look at all the evidence, and that was good enough for me.
My hearing started out a little on the negative side. One of the first things Judge Mary Beth O'connor said was that i wouldn't be able to look at my book of notes unless it was absolutely necessary in which she would then instruct me to do so. Once we got going, things smoothed out and i was able to tell her my side of the story and she never argued with me or raised her voice. She kept the hearing going at a fast pace and she was very polite to my lawyer. She didn't question or disagree with my doctors opinion, but she did get a second opinion from a neutral Doctor who did agree with my doctor. Overall i am pleased with my hearing. I left uncertain, but i left at least knowing that i got a fair hearing and that i knew she was going to look at all the evidence, and that was good enough for me.
Still a relatively new judge at the time of this comment. She's got that typical midwestern nasal voice but is extremely pleasant, maintains control of her hearings, and will allow for argument and/or clarifications on testimony. That said, she's also not as high of a granter as you would expect for this region/ODAR and her previous stats, even with repped claims. She tends to play it safe, cautiously developing the record and siding more often with Agency medical professionals over treating sources, as is typical for new ALJs. If going before her, I highly recommend a 2-to-1 ratio of 2 supportive physicians in your record to every 1 negative Agency physician. Even then, she'll need you to point out at length the objectives, the clinical findings, and overall theory just to get her to budge even a little towards gridding out a claimant or considering giving a treating doctor controlling weight. She just doesn't seem very favorable overall, unfortunately, in contrast to her demeanor. Good luck with this judge if you're assigned to them.
Still a relatively new judge at the time of this comment. She's got that typical midwestern nasal voice but is extremely pleasant, maintains control of her hearings, and will allow for argument and/or clarifications on testimony. That said, she's also not as high of a granter as you would expect for this region/ODAR and her previous stats, even with repped claims. She tends to play it safe, cautiously developing the record and siding more often with Agency medical professionals over treating sources, as is typical for new ALJs. If going before her, I highly recommend a 2-to-1 ratio of 2 supportive physicians in your record to every 1 negative Agency physician. Even then, she'll need you to point out at length the objectives, the clinical findings, and overall theory just to get her to budge even a little towards gridding out a claimant or considering giving a treating doctor controlling weight. She just doesn't seem very favorable overall, unfortunately, in contrast to her demeanor. Good luck with this judge if you're assigned to them.
Still a relatively new judge at the time of this comment. She's got that typical midwestern nasal voice but is extremely pleasant, maintains control of her hearings, and will allow for argument and/or clarifications on testimony. That said, she's also not as high of a granter as you would expect for this region/ODAR and her previous stats, even with repped claims. She tends to play it safe, cautiously developing the record and siding more often with Agency medical professionals over treating sources, as is typical for new ALJs. If going before her, I highly recommend a 2-to-1 ratio of 2 supportive physicians in your record to every 1 negative Agency physician. Even then, she'll need you to point out at length the objectives, the clinical findings, and overall theory just to get her to budge even a little towards gridding out a claimant or considering giving a treating doctor controlling weight. She just doesn't seem very favorable overall, unfortunately, in contrast to her demeanor. Good luck with this judge if you're assigned to them.
This judge is hostile and cynical, and she didn't hesitate to abruptly interrupt me while I was talking. I was humiliated and treated like a criminal.....I cried all the way home (one hour drive for me). She made me wait 6 months for an unfavorable decision, and yet my attorney found a major flaw in her assessment. Run, do not walk, to your appeal if you are unfortunate enough to get this judge. Apparently she's the new Paul G. Robeck
This judge is hostile and cynical, and she didn't hesitate to abruptly interrupt me while I was talking. I was humiliated and treated like a criminal.....I cried all the way home (one hour drive for me). She made me wait 6 months for an unfavorable decision, and yet my attorney found a major flaw in her assessment. Run, do not walk, to your appeal if you are unfortunate enough to get this judge. Apparently she's the new Paul G. Robeck
This judge is hostile and cynical, and she didn't hesitate to abruptly interrupt me while I was talking. I was humiliated and treated like a criminal.....I cried all the way home (one hour drive for me). She made me wait 6 months for an unfavorable decision, and yet my attorney found a major flaw in her assessment. Run, do not walk, to your appeal if you are unfortunate enough to get this judge. Apparently she's the new Paul G. Robeck
This judge is hostile and cynical, and she didn't hesitate to abruptly interrupt me while I was talking. I was humiliated and treated like a criminal.....I cried all the way home (one hour drive for me). She made me wait 6 months for an unfavorable decision, and yet my attorney found a major flaw in her assessment. Run, do not walk, to your appeal if you are unfortunate enough to get this judge. Apparently she's the new Paul G. Robeck
This judge is hostile and cynical, and she didn't hesitate to abruptly interrupt me while I was talking. I was humiliated and treated like a criminal.....I cried all the way home (one hour drive for me). She made me wait 6 months for an unfavorable decision, and yet my attorney found a major flaw in her assessment. Run, do not walk, to your appeal if you are unfortunate enough to get this judge. Apparently she's the new Paul G. Robeck
This judge is hostile and cynical, and she didn't hesitate to abruptly interrupt me while I was talking. I was humiliated and treated like a criminal.....I cried all the way home (one hour drive for me). She made me wait 6 months for an unfavorable decision, and yet my attorney found a major flaw in her assessment. Run, do not walk, to your appeal if you are unfortunate enough to get this judge. Apparently she's the new Paul G. Robeck
Wondering if anyone has been approved disability by judge O'Connor not seeing any comments about outcomes??
Wondering if anyone has been approved disability by judge O'Connor not seeing any comments about outcomes??
Wondering if anyone has been approved disability by judge O'Connor not seeing any comments about outcomes??
Horrible, horrible experience. She dismissed everything I said. My lawyer did not submit a years worth of psych records, which I called him about repeatedly, so everything was off and I didn't know why. This judge dismissed everything I said, everything my provider's said, and denied my claim for the following reasons: I do tai chi (recommended for ptsd and depression), I do meditation (recommended for ptsd and depression), and I bought a cake and asked people to join me for my birthday. Damn, everybody is entitled to a birthday. She said I did not try hard enough to kill myself - I kid you not. I could not even defend myself because no matter what I said she dismissed me. I walked away wanting to die as bad as I ever wanted to die, and I still have no money. suffering horrible I hate my life
Horrible, horrible experience. She dismissed everything I said. My lawyer did not submit a years worth of psych records, which I called him about repeatedly, so everything was off and I didn't know why. This judge dismissed everything I said, everything my provider's said, and denied my claim for the following reasons: I do tai chi (recommended for ptsd and depression), I do meditation (recommended for ptsd and depression), and I bought a cake and asked people to join me for my birthday. Damn, everybody is entitled to a birthday. She said I did not try hard enough to kill myself - I kid you not. I could not even defend myself because no matter what I said she dismissed me. I walked away wanting to die as bad as I ever wanted to die, and I still have no money. suffering horrible I hate my life
Horrible, horrible experience. She dismissed everything I said. My lawyer did not submit a years worth of psych records, which I called him about repeatedly, so everything was off and I didn't know why. This judge dismissed everything I said, everything my provider's said, and denied my claim for the following reasons: I do tai chi (recommended for ptsd and depression), I do meditation (recommended for ptsd and depression), and I bought a cake and asked people to join me for my birthday. Damn, everybody is entitled to a birthday. She said I did not try hard enough to kill myself - I kid you not. I could not even defend myself because no matter what I said she dismissed me. I walked away wanting to die as bad as I ever wanted to die, and I still have no money. suffering horrible I hate my life
viagra cialis viagra from india cost of viagra
viagra cialis viagra from india cost of viagra
I believe this must be a part-time job since the average disposition is 2.5 cases per day? Really, does it take that long to make a decision on a disability case. I want to come work for you.
I believe this must be a part-time job since the average disposition is 2.5 cases per day? Really, does it take that long to make a decision on a disability case. I want to come work for you.
I believe this must be a part-time job since the average disposition is 2.5 cases per day? Really, does it take that long to make a decision on a disability case. I want to come work for you.
Judge John R. Price was very easy for me to open up and talk with. Judge Price, I felt was fair in his decision making. I felt that Judge Price was very knowledgeable with my case and knew more than my attorney! I felt it to be a real honor to have met Judge Price
Judge John R. Price was very easy for me to open up and talk with. Judge Price, I felt was fair in his decision making. I felt that Judge Price was very knowledgeable with my case and knew more than my attorney! I felt it to be a real honor to have met Judge Price
Judge John R. Price was very easy for me to open up and talk with. Judge Price, I felt was fair in his decision making. I felt that Judge Price was very knowledgeable with my case and knew more than my attorney! I felt it to be a real honor to have met Judge Price
Judge Price issued a Fully favorable bench decision for my case. I was very grateful. He is a great judge.
Judge Price issued a Fully favorable bench decision for my case. I was very grateful. He is a great judge.
Judge Price issued a Fully favorable bench decision for my case. I was very grateful. He is a great judge.
Judge Price was very passionate and fair. He ruled in my favor. Thank you
Judge Price was very passionate and fair. He ruled in my favor. Thank you
Judge Price was very passionate and fair. He ruled in my favor. Thank you
It took me 4 years to get to see the judge. On the day of my hearing 12-19-18 my daughter's ride to school was unable to pick her up so I had to take her with me. My attorney was worried because he informed me that most judges didn't allow children in the court room so yes I was nervous at first but when the judge told us to come in I very quickly explained what happened and he just smiled and said ok. Now as the procedure went I will say that John price was very nice and gave me enough time to give him a clear and unrushed answer. I filled for my phiscal disability because I have to have a full knee replacement and I need back surgery but my insurance is giving me hard time to even get these procedures done so to say I'm in pain all the time is very true. It's been hard trying to provide for me and my daughter since my limitations have started but somehow the Lord made a way. Well my judge was very nice and polite so now it's a waiting game yes we are praying it goes in our favor but will have to wait and see. I just want to say thank you Jude price for being nice and understanding.
It took me 4 years to get to see the judge. On the day of my hearing 12-19-18 my daughter's ride to school was unable to pick her up so I had to take her with me. My attorney was worried because he informed me that most judges didn't allow children in the court room so yes I was nervous at first but when the judge told us to come in I very quickly explained what happened and he just smiled and said ok. Now as the procedure went I will say that John price was very nice and gave me enough time to give him a clear and unrushed answer. I filled for my phiscal disability because I have to have a full knee replacement and I need back surgery but my insurance is giving me hard time to even get these procedures done so to say I'm in pain all the time is very true. It's been hard trying to provide for me and my daughter since my limitations have started but somehow the Lord made a way. Well my judge was very nice and polite so now it's a waiting game yes we are praying it goes in our favor but will have to wait and see. I just want to say thank you Jude price for being nice and understanding.
It took me 4 years to get to see the judge. On the day of my hearing 12-19-18 my daughter's ride to school was unable to pick her up so I had to take her with me. My attorney was worried because he informed me that most judges didn't allow children in the court room so yes I was nervous at first but when the judge told us to come in I very quickly explained what happened and he just smiled and said ok. Now as the procedure went I will say that John price was very nice and gave me enough time to give him a clear and unrushed answer. I filled for my phiscal disability because I have to have a full knee replacement and I need back surgery but my insurance is giving me hard time to even get these procedures done so to say I'm in pain all the time is very true. It's been hard trying to provide for me and my daughter since my limitations have started but somehow the Lord made a way. Well my judge was very nice and polite so now it's a waiting game yes we are praying it goes in our favor but will have to wait and see. I just want to say thank you Jude price for being nice and understanding.
1
1
1
This judge is known by many that he is an elitist, xenophobe, and just plain rude towards attorneys and their clients. He is known by many for these traits. Before cases are over makes judgments that make no sense. His rulings are biased and prejudicial. Heaven help you if he doesn't like the way you look or act. He is know to give more denials than any other judge! It's a fact, just look it up.
This judge is known by many that he is an elitist, xenophobe, and just plain rude towards attorneys and their clients. He is known by many for these traits. Before cases are over makes judgments that make no sense. His rulings are biased and prejudicial. Heaven help you if he doesn't like the way you look or act. He is know to give more denials than any other judge! It's a fact, just look it up.
This judge is known by many that he is an elitist, xenophobe, and just plain rude towards attorneys and their clients. He is known by many for these traits. Before cases are over makes judgments that make no sense. His rulings are biased and prejudicial. Heaven help you if he doesn't like the way you look or act. He is know to give more denials than any other judge! It's a fact, just look it up.
This judge was horrible to us. My child is Native American Indian, and this judge was rude and horrible towards us. He denied my child disablilty even though there was sufficient evidence that there was proof of mental disability. This man has no business being a judge because it's obvious if you are not white, then he will be prejudice against you.
This judge was horrible to us. My child is Native American Indian, and this judge was rude and horrible towards us. He denied my child disablilty even though there was sufficient evidence that there was proof of mental disability. This man has no business being a judge because it's obvious if you are not white, then he will be prejudice against you.
This judge was horrible to us. My child is Native American Indian, and this judge was rude and horrible towards us. He denied my child disablilty even though there was sufficient evidence that there was proof of mental disability. This man has no business being a judge because it's obvious if you are not white, then he will be prejudice against you.
Arrogant jerk.
Arrogant jerk.
Arrogant jerk.
Unfortunately you cannot choose the judge of your choice to preside over your case. And now the attorneys you hire to represent you are not being told which judge your is going to be assingened to which makes things even more difficult for them.
Unfortunately you cannot choose the judge of your choice to preside over your case. And now the attorneys you hire to represent you are not being told which judge your is going to be assingened to which makes things even more difficult for them.
Unfortunately you cannot choose the judge of your choice to preside over your case. And now the attorneys you hire to represent you are not being told which judge your is going to be assingened to which makes things even more difficult for them.
This Judge asked questions about things that are not remotely related to the things at hand.I ask you are we guilty before we are even judged,I will tell you that is how I felt while I sat in front of him and he denied me WOW!!.I now have a bulging disc in my neck a torn tendon in my ankle and arthritis in lower back and also p.t.s.d. and he still denied me.
This Judge asked questions about things that are not remotely related to the things at hand.I ask you are we guilty before we are even judged,I will tell you that is how I felt while I sat in front of him and he denied me WOW!!.I now have a bulging disc in my neck a torn tendon in my ankle and arthritis in lower back and also p.t.s.d. and he still denied me.
This Judge asked questions about things that are not remotely related to the things at hand.I ask you are we guilty before we are even judged,I will tell you that is how I felt while I sat in front of him and he denied me WOW!!.I now have a bulging disc in my neck a torn tendon in my ankle and arthritis in lower back and also p.t.s.d. and he still denied me.
I Yvette Kelley am now representing myself in a appeal that is in process , I have new evidence that has been discovered as to what caused the Disability . In 2005 , DR. Zenhopher from Kasier Sunnyside Hospital diagnosed me with " SUI " a condition in which was severely impacting a hygenic problem that caused me to Uriante all over clothing , The Procedure that was done is " Vaginal Mesh Implant " They are responsible for many deaths and sever issues I had for years not knowing what was causing sever pain and illness . The Johnson and Johnson company is responsible for defective Vaginal mesh that caused me to almost die and lead to sever problems and pain . This should have been noted by my atty , however ..he did not represent me in the way he should have , he over looked all of this and became prejudice Of the Honorable Judge Robeck on my case , resulting in Firing me after 5 yrs.
I Yvette Kelley am now representing myself in a appeal that is in process , I have new evidence that has been discovered as to what caused the Disability . In 2005 , DR. Zenhopher from Kasier Sunnyside Hospital diagnosed me with " SUI " a condition in which was severely impacting a hygenic problem that caused me to Uriante all over clothing , The Procedure that was done is " Vaginal Mesh Implant " They are responsible for many deaths and sever issues I had for years not knowing what was causing sever pain and illness . The Johnson and Johnson company is responsible for defective Vaginal mesh that caused me to almost die and lead to sever problems and pain . This should have been noted by my atty , however ..he did not represent me in the way he should have , he over looked all of this and became prejudice Of the Honorable Judge Robeck on my case , resulting in Firing me after 5 yrs.
I Yvette Kelley am now representing myself in a appeal that is in process , I have new evidence that has been discovered as to what caused the Disability . In 2005 , DR. Zenhopher from Kasier Sunnyside Hospital diagnosed me with " SUI " a condition in which was severely impacting a hygenic problem that caused me to Uriante all over clothing , The Procedure that was done is " Vaginal Mesh Implant " They are responsible for many deaths and sever issues I had for years not knowing what was causing sever pain and illness . The Johnson and Johnson company is responsible for defective Vaginal mesh that caused me to almost die and lead to sever problems and pain . This should have been noted by my atty , however ..he did not represent me in the way he should have , he over looked all of this and became prejudice Of the Honorable Judge Robeck on my case , resulting in Firing me after 5 yrs.
im worried now after reading all this about this judge that im surely going to loose my case coming up :( it seems no one has a chance with this judge unless you are with out legs or an arm. and even then it seems from his denial percentages and these comments left by others is that he just plainly dont have no regards for the pain or suffering.. even though none of these judges are doctors or mental health specialists.. and they are clearly not god. but play god to save a buck, which is not there money.and then the world wonder why people go insane and commit crazy acts in the community, because their problem's are over looked by such person's or people and society as an whole. until after a crime has happen in the manner of your mental health problems or some other depression or mental episodes that you some times have no control of. then thats when people open their eyes and say oh somthin is really wrong with him and he or she needs help.but when they could have gotten the proper help and attention from the gate from these judge's and other proper social security personel and doctors! but its not the doctors who's pertraying thats nothin wrong with you its these kind of judges on this pannel who pass their on personel opinion with out properly looking at one's evidence to really determin your status and mental health problems. im not putting any of these judges down, but the system and manner in which these judges decide cases needs to be looked at and properly managed by a by party personel or group. almost like a watch dog group. sorry about my misspelling but im clearly in my feeling's by such actions by most of these alj judges..
im worried now after reading all this about this judge that im surely going to loose my case coming up :( it seems no one has a chance with this judge unless you are with out legs or an arm. and even then it seems from his denial percentages and these comments left by others is that he just plainly dont have no regards for the pain or suffering.. even though none of these judges are doctors or mental health specialists.. and they are clearly not god. but play god to save a buck, which is not there money.and then the world wonder why people go insane and commit crazy acts in the community, because their problem's are over looked by such person's or people and society as an whole. until after a crime has happen in the manner of your mental health problems or some other depression or mental episodes that you some times have no control of. then thats when people open their eyes and say oh somthin is really wrong with him and he or she needs help.but when they could have gotten the proper help and attention from the gate from these judge's and other proper social security personel and doctors! but its not the doctors who's pertraying thats nothin wrong with you its these kind of judges on this pannel who pass their on personel opinion with out properly looking at one's evidence to really determin your status and mental health problems. im not putting any of these judges down, but the system and manner in which these judges decide cases needs to be looked at and properly managed by a by party personel or group. almost like a watch dog group. sorry about my misspelling but im clearly in my feeling's by such actions by most of these alj judges..
im worried now after reading all this about this judge that im surely going to loose my case coming up :( it seems no one has a chance with this judge unless you are with out legs or an arm. and even then it seems from his denial percentages and these comments left by others is that he just plainly dont have no regards for the pain or suffering.. even though none of these judges are doctors or mental health specialists.. and they are clearly not god. but play god to save a buck, which is not there money.and then the world wonder why people go insane and commit crazy acts in the community, because their problem's are over looked by such person's or people and society as an whole. until after a crime has happen in the manner of your mental health problems or some other depression or mental episodes that you some times have no control of. then thats when people open their eyes and say oh somthin is really wrong with him and he or she needs help.but when they could have gotten the proper help and attention from the gate from these judge's and other proper social security personel and doctors! but its not the doctors who's pertraying thats nothin wrong with you its these kind of judges on this pannel who pass their on personel opinion with out properly looking at one's evidence to really determin your status and mental health problems. im not putting any of these judges down, but the system and manner in which these judges decide cases needs to be looked at and properly managed by a by party personel or group. almost like a watch dog group. sorry about my misspelling but im clearly in my feeling's by such actions by most of these alj judges..
JUDGE ROBECK IS A VERY HARSH JUDGE, I FEEL SORRY FOR WHOM EVER COME BEFORE HIM. HE CLEARLY DISREGARD WHAT THE DOCOTOR SAY AND FORM HIS OWN OPINION OF WHATS WRONG WITH YOU. LOOK AT HIS APPROVAL RATE OF 35% THATS SAY EVERYTHING ABOUT HOW HE FEELS ABOUT 65% OF PEOPLE WHO COMES BEFORE HIM. THATS ALOT OF PEOPLE TO BE DENIED FOR HIS ON PERSONNEL REASON'S.HE LOOSES HIS SCOPE OF WORK AS A JUDGE AND PLAY DOCTOR OF ALL DOCTOR'S, HE EVEN DISCREDIT HIS OWN SSA DOCTORS. WHO DOES THAT? HE TALKED DOWN ON MY CASE ABOUT THINGS THAT HAS NOTHIN TO DO WITH ILLNESS. SOME ONE HIGHER UP NEEDS TO AUDIT JUDGE ROBECK AND HIS ANTICS AND HIS RAGE TWARDS THE ILL PEOPLE MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY OF OUR COMMUNITY. MAY GOD HELP YOU IF YOU COME BEFORE JUDGE ROBECK FOR ANYTHING... YOU WILL BE DENIED...
JUDGE ROBECK IS A VERY HARSH JUDGE, I FEEL SORRY FOR WHOM EVER COME BEFORE HIM. HE CLEARLY DISREGARD WHAT THE DOCOTOR SAY AND FORM HIS OWN OPINION OF WHATS WRONG WITH YOU. LOOK AT HIS APPROVAL RATE OF 35% THATS SAY EVERYTHING ABOUT HOW HE FEELS ABOUT 65% OF PEOPLE WHO COMES BEFORE HIM. THATS ALOT OF PEOPLE TO BE DENIED FOR HIS ON PERSONNEL REASON'S.HE LOOSES HIS SCOPE OF WORK AS A JUDGE AND PLAY DOCTOR OF ALL DOCTOR'S, HE EVEN DISCREDIT HIS OWN SSA DOCTORS. WHO DOES THAT? HE TALKED DOWN ON MY CASE ABOUT THINGS THAT HAS NOTHIN TO DO WITH ILLNESS. SOME ONE HIGHER UP NEEDS TO AUDIT JUDGE ROBECK AND HIS ANTICS AND HIS RAGE TWARDS THE ILL PEOPLE MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY OF OUR COMMUNITY. MAY GOD HELP YOU IF YOU COME BEFORE JUDGE ROBECK FOR ANYTHING... YOU WILL BE DENIED...
JUDGE ROBECK IS A VERY HARSH JUDGE, I FEEL SORRY FOR WHOM EVER COME BEFORE HIM. HE CLEARLY DISREGARD WHAT THE DOCOTOR SAY AND FORM HIS OWN OPINION OF WHATS WRONG WITH YOU. LOOK AT HIS APPROVAL RATE OF 35% THATS SAY EVERYTHING ABOUT HOW HE FEELS ABOUT 65% OF PEOPLE WHO COMES BEFORE HIM. THATS ALOT OF PEOPLE TO BE DENIED FOR HIS ON PERSONNEL REASON'S.HE LOOSES HIS SCOPE OF WORK AS A JUDGE AND PLAY DOCTOR OF ALL DOCTOR'S, HE EVEN DISCREDIT HIS OWN SSA DOCTORS. WHO DOES THAT? HE TALKED DOWN ON MY CASE ABOUT THINGS THAT HAS NOTHIN TO DO WITH ILLNESS. SOME ONE HIGHER UP NEEDS TO AUDIT JUDGE ROBECK AND HIS ANTICS AND HIS RAGE TWARDS THE ILL PEOPLE MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY OF OUR COMMUNITY. MAY GOD HELP YOU IF YOU COME BEFORE JUDGE ROBECK FOR ANYTHING... YOU WILL BE DENIED...
LOOK AT JUDGE ROBECKS STATS HE HAS WENT DOWN IN APPROVAL RATINGS.. HE 33% NOW HE APPROVED 78 CASES OUT OF 236 TELL ME SOMTHIN AINT WRONG WITH HIS SCOPE OF WORK. HE NEEDS TO BE LOOKED AT, AND HIS MORAL'S AS DECIDING OVER CASES SHOULD BE AUDITED.. ITS PLAIN AND CLEARLY SHOWS HE'S IS AGAINST PEOPLE WITH MENTAL OR PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS.. HE MUST FEEL HE IS PAYING OUT OF HIS POCKET TO HELP THE ILL PEOPLE OF OUR COMMUNITY WHO TRULY NEEDS HELP FROM SSI OR SSD.. PEOPLE WHO TRULY HAS SOME KNID OF MENTAL OR PHYSICAL ILLNESS OR BOTH. I WONDER DOES JUDGE ROBECK HAS AN PHD FROM HARVARD. OR SOME OTHER DOCTORAL SCHOOL FOR HIM TO PASS HIS PERSONEL JUDGEMENT FOR THE ILLNESS IN PEOPLE. BUT I CLEARLY BELIEVE ITS HIS OWN OPINION THAT HE PASS ALONG UPON EACH CASE. HE DOESN'T CARE WHAT THE MEDICAL RECORD REFLECT OR WHAT SSA DOCTORS SAY OR ANY DOCOTOR. MOST OF THE TIME HE HAS HIS MIND MADE UP OF YOU BEFORE HE EVEN START THE PROCEEDINGS. IF HE DOSE'NT LIKE YOUR WALK OR TALK OR THE WAY YOU LOOK "DENIED" CARRY YOUR BIBBLE WHEN WALKING INTO HIS CIRCUS ROOM CAUSE YOU WILL NEED IT. AND EVEN THEN THAT MAY NOT HELP YOU.. SOME ONE OR OUR COMMUNITY NEEDS TO VOTE THESE KIND OF ALJ JUDGES OUT, NOT BECAUSE HE DONT APPROVE EVERY ONE THAT COMES BEFORE HIM, BUT BECAUSE HE PLAYS DOCTOR WITH OUT A PHD. AND HE PUTS HIS OWN BELIEFS AND VIEWS PERSONALLY UPON EVERY ONE THAT COMES BEFORE HIM. ITS SAD!
LOOK AT JUDGE ROBECKS STATS HE HAS WENT DOWN IN APPROVAL RATINGS.. HE 33% NOW HE APPROVED 78 CASES OUT OF 236 TELL ME SOMTHIN AINT WRONG WITH HIS SCOPE OF WORK. HE NEEDS TO BE LOOKED AT, AND HIS MORAL'S AS DECIDING OVER CASES SHOULD BE AUDITED.. ITS PLAIN AND CLEARLY SHOWS HE'S IS AGAINST PEOPLE WITH MENTAL OR PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS.. HE MUST FEEL HE IS PAYING OUT OF HIS POCKET TO HELP THE ILL PEOPLE OF OUR COMMUNITY WHO TRULY NEEDS HELP FROM SSI OR SSD.. PEOPLE WHO TRULY HAS SOME KNID OF MENTAL OR PHYSICAL ILLNESS OR BOTH. I WONDER DOES JUDGE ROBECK HAS AN PHD FROM HARVARD. OR SOME OTHER DOCTORAL SCHOOL FOR HIM TO PASS HIS PERSONEL JUDGEMENT FOR THE ILLNESS IN PEOPLE. BUT I CLEARLY BELIEVE ITS HIS OWN OPINION THAT HE PASS ALONG UPON EACH CASE. HE DOESN'T CARE WHAT THE MEDICAL RECORD REFLECT OR WHAT SSA DOCTORS SAY OR ANY DOCOTOR. MOST OF THE TIME HE HAS HIS MIND MADE UP OF YOU BEFORE HE EVEN START THE PROCEEDINGS. IF HE DOSE'NT LIKE YOUR WALK OR TALK OR THE WAY YOU LOOK "DENIED" CARRY YOUR BIBBLE WHEN WALKING INTO HIS CIRCUS ROOM CAUSE YOU WILL NEED IT. AND EVEN THEN THAT MAY NOT HELP YOU.. SOME ONE OR OUR COMMUNITY NEEDS TO VOTE THESE KIND OF ALJ JUDGES OUT, NOT BECAUSE HE DONT APPROVE EVERY ONE THAT COMES BEFORE HIM, BUT BECAUSE HE PLAYS DOCTOR WITH OUT A PHD. AND HE PUTS HIS OWN BELIEFS AND VIEWS PERSONALLY UPON EVERY ONE THAT COMES BEFORE HIM. ITS SAD!
LOOK AT JUDGE ROBECKS STATS HE HAS WENT DOWN IN APPROVAL RATINGS.. HE 33% NOW HE APPROVED 78 CASES OUT OF 236 TELL ME SOMTHIN AINT WRONG WITH HIS SCOPE OF WORK. HE NEEDS TO BE LOOKED AT, AND HIS MORAL'S AS DECIDING OVER CASES SHOULD BE AUDITED.. ITS PLAIN AND CLEARLY SHOWS HE'S IS AGAINST PEOPLE WITH MENTAL OR PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS.. HE MUST FEEL HE IS PAYING OUT OF HIS POCKET TO HELP THE ILL PEOPLE OF OUR COMMUNITY WHO TRULY NEEDS HELP FROM SSI OR SSD.. PEOPLE WHO TRULY HAS SOME KNID OF MENTAL OR PHYSICAL ILLNESS OR BOTH. I WONDER DOES JUDGE ROBECK HAS AN PHD FROM HARVARD. OR SOME OTHER DOCTORAL SCHOOL FOR HIM TO PASS HIS PERSONEL JUDGEMENT FOR THE ILLNESS IN PEOPLE. BUT I CLEARLY BELIEVE ITS HIS OWN OPINION THAT HE PASS ALONG UPON EACH CASE. HE DOESN'T CARE WHAT THE MEDICAL RECORD REFLECT OR WHAT SSA DOCTORS SAY OR ANY DOCOTOR. MOST OF THE TIME HE HAS HIS MIND MADE UP OF YOU BEFORE HE EVEN START THE PROCEEDINGS. IF HE DOSE'NT LIKE YOUR WALK OR TALK OR THE WAY YOU LOOK "DENIED" CARRY YOUR BIBBLE WHEN WALKING INTO HIS CIRCUS ROOM CAUSE YOU WILL NEED IT. AND EVEN THEN THAT MAY NOT HELP YOU.. SOME ONE OR OUR COMMUNITY NEEDS TO VOTE THESE KIND OF ALJ JUDGES OUT, NOT BECAUSE HE DONT APPROVE EVERY ONE THAT COMES BEFORE HIM, BUT BECAUSE HE PLAYS DOCTOR WITH OUT A PHD. AND HE PUTS HIS OWN BELIEFS AND VIEWS PERSONALLY UPON EVERY ONE THAT COMES BEFORE HIM. ITS SAD!
Unfortunately this Judge is committing crimes against the people! Please investigate him.
Unfortunately this Judge is committing crimes against the people! Please investigate him.
Unfortunately this Judge is committing crimes against the people! Please investigate him.
One year after the death of my son, I received a letter from Social Security that there was abuse of power by Judge Robeck. A year and 3 days after his death, it sits in appeals court. We applied for disability 6 years ago, and he died at age 44 of his disease. Judge Robeck is in my eyes a criminal.
One year after the death of my son, I received a letter from Social Security that there was abuse of power by Judge Robeck. A year and 3 days after his death, it sits in appeals court. We applied for disability 6 years ago, and he died at age 44 of his disease. Judge Robeck is in my eyes a criminal.
One year after the death of my son, I received a letter from Social Security that there was abuse of power by Judge Robeck. A year and 3 days after his death, it sits in appeals court. We applied for disability 6 years ago, and he died at age 44 of his disease. Judge Robeck is in my eyes a criminal.
It did not go well for me and I am a one hundred percent disabled veteran. I am going before a new Judge in a few weeks. I am not holding out any hope. After this case, my suicide contract is up anyway. What a callosal joke this had been. I served my country, and in my time of need, she turned her back on me.
It did not go well for me and I am a one hundred percent disabled veteran. I am going before a new Judge in a few weeks. I am not holding out any hope. After this case, my suicide contract is up anyway. What a callosal joke this had been. I served my country, and in my time of need, she turned her back on me.
It did not go well for me and I am a one hundred percent disabled veteran. I am going before a new Judge in a few weeks. I am not holding out any hope. After this case, my suicide contract is up anyway. What a callosal joke this had been. I served my country, and in my time of need, she turned her back on me.
It did not go well for me and I am a one hundred percent disabled veteran. I am going before a new Judge in a few weeks. I am not holding out any hope. After this case, my suicide contract is up anyway. What a callosal joke this had been. I served my country, and in my time of need, she turned her back on me.
It did not go well for me and I am a one hundred percent disabled veteran. I am going before a new Judge in a few weeks. I am not holding out any hope. After this case, my suicide contract is up anyway. What a callosal joke this had been. I served my country, and in my time of need, she turned her back on me.
It did not go well for me and I am a one hundred percent disabled veteran. I am going before a new Judge in a few weeks. I am not holding out any hope. After this case, my suicide contract is up anyway. What a callosal joke this had been. I served my country, and in my time of need, she turned her back on me.
pompas jackass, will elaborate when i have more time
pompas jackass, will elaborate when i have more time
pompas jackass, will elaborate when i have more time
Even though his approval ratings have improved since he worked in San Jose(70% denied), this is not a judge you want to appear before. Most of his opinion is based on the Social Security doctor's evaluations and not the overall medical record. The problem I see with this is that the Social Security doctors only see the patient once and their opinions are obviously swayed to the benefit of their employer and not the patient.
Even though his approval ratings have improved since he worked in San Jose(70% denied), this is not a judge you want to appear before. Most of his opinion is based on the Social Security doctor's evaluations and not the overall medical record. The problem I see with this is that the Social Security doctors only see the patient once and their opinions are obviously swayed to the benefit of their employer and not the patient.
Even though his approval ratings have improved since he worked in San Jose(70% denied), this is not a judge you want to appear before. Most of his opinion is based on the Social Security doctor's evaluations and not the overall medical record. The problem I see with this is that the Social Security doctors only see the patient once and their opinions are obviously swayed to the benefit of their employer and not the patient.
just my opinion he acts like a know it all brat & dont expect fair decision
just my opinion he acts like a know it all brat & dont expect fair decision
just my opinion he acts like a know it all brat & dont expect fair decision
This judge's decisions should be looked at closely.
This judge's decisions should be looked at closely.
This judge's decisions should be looked at closely.
Skarda took the opportunity to insult client during hearing. Not much better with his decision than manners.
Skarda took the opportunity to insult client during hearing. Not much better with his decision than manners.
Skarda took the opportunity to insult client during hearing. Not much better with his decision than manners.
This judge is fair and balanced and shows good stewardship of the tax payer dollar!!
This judge is fair and balanced and shows good stewardship of the tax payer dollar!!
This judge is fair and balanced and shows good stewardship of the tax payer dollar!!
Judge Skarda was very insightful and compassionate when hearing my mother's case today. We appreciate the time he took with our case. Thank you
Judge Skarda was very insightful and compassionate when hearing my mother's case today. We appreciate the time he took with our case. Thank you
Judge Skarda was very insightful and compassionate when hearing my mother's case today. We appreciate the time he took with our case. Thank you
Christopher Trevor Skarda has let his license to practice law expire from what I saw online, so he must think he has this job for life. He does act snobby and prejudiced. He made sure to ask if I smoke. He also made a big deal of my weight, I felt shamed, then did not consider it a disabling factor or symptom of the disability. Yes, I saw that look of contempt on his face several times during the hearing. A good piece of my disability, mentally and physically, was from physically violent domestic abuse, which was never considered or discussed in my decision letter. I seriously question his ability to decided anything fairly because he seemed more interested in his own biases in the decision letter.
Christopher Trevor Skarda has let his license to practice law expire from what I saw online, so he must think he has this job for life. He does act snobby and prejudiced. He made sure to ask if I smoke. He also made a big deal of my weight, I felt shamed, then did not consider it a disabling factor or symptom of the disability. Yes, I saw that look of contempt on his face several times during the hearing. A good piece of my disability, mentally and physically, was from physically violent domestic abuse, which was never considered or discussed in my decision letter. I seriously question his ability to decided anything fairly because he seemed more interested in his own biases in the decision letter.
Christopher Trevor Skarda has let his license to practice law expire from what I saw online, so he must think he has this job for life. He does act snobby and prejudiced. He made sure to ask if I smoke. He also made a big deal of my weight, I felt shamed, then did not consider it a disabling factor or symptom of the disability. Yes, I saw that look of contempt on his face several times during the hearing. A good piece of my disability, mentally and physically, was from physically violent domestic abuse, which was never considered or discussed in my decision letter. I seriously question his ability to decided anything fairly because he seemed more interested in his own biases in the decision letter.
ALJ Skarda apparently believes that it is his patriotic duty to save the country money by denying disability claims. I represent claimants in the Sacramento, San Raphael, Stockton, Fresno, and Redding hearing offices, and Skarda is the most conservative ALJ in Northern California. For instance, in one case my client went to hearing in a necessarily prescribed walker. Her medical records were voluminous, with many opinions from her specialists. Despite conflicting medical source statements from my clients specialists regarding her RFC, Skarda gave the VE ridiculous hypotheticals, which were answered by the VE with equally ridiculous representative jobs. In the written decision, Skarda gave controlling weight to the state agency examiner's opinions, despite overwhelming contrary evidence from the claimant's doctors. This ALJ needs to be brought to the attention of The Division of Quality Service and disciplined or removed from the bench.
ALJ Skarda apparently believes that it is his patriotic duty to save the country money by denying disability claims. I represent claimants in the Sacramento, San Raphael, Stockton, Fresno, and Redding hearing offices, and Skarda is the most conservative ALJ in Northern California. For instance, in one case my client went to hearing in a necessarily prescribed walker. Her medical records were voluminous, with many opinions from her specialists. Despite conflicting medical source statements from my clients specialists regarding her RFC, Skarda gave the VE ridiculous hypotheticals, which were answered by the VE with equally ridiculous representative jobs. In the written decision, Skarda gave controlling weight to the state agency examiner's opinions, despite overwhelming contrary evidence from the claimant's doctors. This ALJ needs to be brought to the attention of The Division of Quality Service and disciplined or removed from the bench.
ALJ Skarda apparently believes that it is his patriotic duty to save the country money by denying disability claims. I represent claimants in the Sacramento, San Raphael, Stockton, Fresno, and Redding hearing offices, and Skarda is the most conservative ALJ in Northern California. For instance, in one case my client went to hearing in a necessarily prescribed walker. Her medical records were voluminous, with many opinions from her specialists. Despite conflicting medical source statements from my clients specialists regarding her RFC, Skarda gave the VE ridiculous hypotheticals, which were answered by the VE with equally ridiculous representative jobs. In the written decision, Skarda gave controlling weight to the state agency examiner's opinions, despite overwhelming contrary evidence from the claimant's doctors. This ALJ needs to be brought to the attention of The Division of Quality Service and disciplined or removed from the bench.
Professional judge with solid statistics. He is not the worse judge in this office or Northern California. Yes, he's very laid-back and no, he's not coddling you. He has to decide how to use the taxpayer's money and he takes that seriously so he will question you about smoking, weight, etc... If obesity aggravates your condition or smoking, why should taxpayers pay for that? I'm not asking that but that is the question the judge will want to know. Or why should we pay this claim for a diabetic who refuses to take his insulin. So judges will ask tough questions. Judge Skarda, like most judges will go with the state's RFC if there are no opinions from treating providers OR opinion evidence from treating provider's based solely on subjective complaints or not consistent with record as a whole. Claimants will view him hardly because they've only seen him once. As an attorney, I can say he's fair and professional, and quite thorough in how he handles his cases.
Professional judge with solid statistics. He is not the worse judge in this office or Northern California. Yes, he's very laid-back and no, he's not coddling you. He has to decide how to use the taxpayer's money and he takes that seriously so he will question you about smoking, weight, etc... If obesity aggravates your condition or smoking, why should taxpayers pay for that? I'm not asking that but that is the question the judge will want to know. Or why should we pay this claim for a diabetic who refuses to take his insulin. So judges will ask tough questions. Judge Skarda, like most judges will go with the state's RFC if there are no opinions from treating providers OR opinion evidence from treating provider's based solely on subjective complaints or not consistent with record as a whole. Claimants will view him hardly because they've only seen him once. As an attorney, I can say he's fair and professional, and quite thorough in how he handles his cases.
Professional judge with solid statistics. He is not the worse judge in this office or Northern California. Yes, he's very laid-back and no, he's not coddling you. He has to decide how to use the taxpayer's money and he takes that seriously so he will question you about smoking, weight, etc... If obesity aggravates your condition or smoking, why should taxpayers pay for that? I'm not asking that but that is the question the judge will want to know. Or why should we pay this claim for a diabetic who refuses to take his insulin. So judges will ask tough questions. Judge Skarda, like most judges will go with the state's RFC if there are no opinions from treating providers OR opinion evidence from treating provider's based solely on subjective complaints or not consistent with record as a whole. Claimants will view him hardly because they've only seen him once. As an attorney, I can say he's fair and professional, and quite thorough in how he handles his cases.
He is the WORST!!!! I had private doctors do my evals as well as there retarded doctors and he only went with the retarded doctors opinion. I am not mentally disabled, I am physically disabled and all he wanted to focus on was my mental. Therefore DENIED!!! I personally thought they picked up a bumb off the streets of Stockton and told him to play judge when he walked in. Shorts, robe, long greasy straggly long hair. I felt like asking him to please take a shower when he came in. Not impressed at all. Maybe he really does need to go to law school again. At least personal hygiene and professional training. His remark in my denial letter "claimant was well dressed and put together so she can take care of herself". HELLO I am going to court, I thought I should get out of my jammies. Maybe he should take some of his own criticism.
He is the WORST!!!! I had private doctors do my evals as well as there retarded doctors and he only went with the retarded doctors opinion. I am not mentally disabled, I am physically disabled and all he wanted to focus on was my mental. Therefore DENIED!!! I personally thought they picked up a bumb off the streets of Stockton and told him to play judge when he walked in. Shorts, robe, long greasy straggly long hair. I felt like asking him to please take a shower when he came in. Not impressed at all. Maybe he really does need to go to law school again. At least personal hygiene and professional training. His remark in my denial letter "claimant was well dressed and put together so she can take care of herself". HELLO I am going to court, I thought I should get out of my jammies. Maybe he should take some of his own criticism.
He is the WORST!!!! I had private doctors do my evals as well as there retarded doctors and he only went with the retarded doctors opinion. I am not mentally disabled, I am physically disabled and all he wanted to focus on was my mental. Therefore DENIED!!! I personally thought they picked up a bumb off the streets of Stockton and told him to play judge when he walked in. Shorts, robe, long greasy straggly long hair. I felt like asking him to please take a shower when he came in. Not impressed at all. Maybe he really does need to go to law school again. At least personal hygiene and professional training. His remark in my denial letter "claimant was well dressed and put together so she can take care of herself". HELLO I am going to court, I thought I should get out of my jammies. Maybe he should take some of his own criticism.
I had this judge for my hearing; he had some hard questions, but between my statements & medical records, the case was approved. Total time maybe 20 minutes. No complaints!
I had this judge for my hearing; he had some hard questions, but between my statements & medical records, the case was approved. Total time maybe 20 minutes. No complaints!
I had this judge for my hearing; he had some hard questions, but between my statements & medical records, the case was approved. Total time maybe 20 minutes. No complaints!
So I read all of the comments about this Judge in preparation for a full day of hearings before him. I will say after six hearings that I think the criticisms are unfairly leveled against this ALJ. He knew each case extremely well before they ever walked into his hearing room. He wanted the time in the hearing to be focused on the relevant issues and not, as so many ALJs are prone to, asking scores of ultimately irrelevant questions. He was very cordial to the claimants and even took the time on several of them to thank them for their cases, since we (he, the VHR, me, the VE) were all there to service their case and the system that they worked so hard to pay into. I think the attorneys in Stockton must be trying to keep other attorneys from the area by saying he's so rough (joking), but I found him to be fair and delightful to deal with.
So I read all of the comments about this Judge in preparation for a full day of hearings before him. I will say after six hearings that I think the criticisms are unfairly leveled against this ALJ. He knew each case extremely well before they ever walked into his hearing room. He wanted the time in the hearing to be focused on the relevant issues and not, as so many ALJs are prone to, asking scores of ultimately irrelevant questions. He was very cordial to the claimants and even took the time on several of them to thank them for their cases, since we (he, the VHR, me, the VE) were all there to service their case and the system that they worked so hard to pay into. I think the attorneys in Stockton must be trying to keep other attorneys from the area by saying he's so rough (joking), but I found him to be fair and delightful to deal with.
So I read all of the comments about this Judge in preparation for a full day of hearings before him. I will say after six hearings that I think the criticisms are unfairly leveled against this ALJ. He knew each case extremely well before they ever walked into his hearing room. He wanted the time in the hearing to be focused on the relevant issues and not, as so many ALJs are prone to, asking scores of ultimately irrelevant questions. He was very cordial to the claimants and even took the time on several of them to thank them for their cases, since we (he, the VHR, me, the VE) were all there to service their case and the system that they worked so hard to pay into. I think the attorneys in Stockton must be trying to keep other attorneys from the area by saying he's so rough (joking), but I found him to be fair and delightful to deal with.
I appeared before him in December 2017. I was very happy that he had already gone over my records and was able to ask specific questions. He has a rather laid back attitude but his questioning is very direct and professional. He doesn’t waste any time and keeps the hearings short. He issued a partially favorable decision in my case, and I thought the decision was well written and very helpful to my understanding why he changed my onset date. If you are assigned to this judge, don’t fret. Just make sure you are prepared.
I appeared before him in December 2017. I was very happy that he had already gone over my records and was able to ask specific questions. He has a rather laid back attitude but his questioning is very direct and professional. He doesn’t waste any time and keeps the hearings short. He issued a partially favorable decision in my case, and I thought the decision was well written and very helpful to my understanding why he changed my onset date. If you are assigned to this judge, don’t fret. Just make sure you are prepared.
I appeared before him in December 2017. I was very happy that he had already gone over my records and was able to ask specific questions. He has a rather laid back attitude but his questioning is very direct and professional. He doesn’t waste any time and keeps the hearings short. He issued a partially favorable decision in my case, and I thought the decision was well written and very helpful to my understanding why he changed my onset date. If you are assigned to this judge, don’t fret. Just make sure you are prepared.
The process of my SSDI claim was tedious and stressfull to me, though saddly warranted. I believe Judge Tracy to be professional, fair, thorough and focused on the Rules, the law and justice. Mine was a good outcome, but I believe too it was given without bias. Thank You
The process of my SSDI claim was tedious and stressfull to me, though saddly warranted. I believe Judge Tracy to be professional, fair, thorough and focused on the Rules, the law and justice. Mine was a good outcome, but I believe too it was given without bias. Thank You
The process of my SSDI claim was tedious and stressfull to me, though saddly warranted. I believe Judge Tracy to be professional, fair, thorough and focused on the Rules, the law and justice. Mine was a good outcome, but I believe too it was given without bias. Thank You
This judge is terrible and only knows the black and white print of the law and the the "spirit" of the law. She should be removed! I have suffered from hydrocephalus (water on the brain) my whole life. I have had 38 operations for shunt revisions and have brain damage from excessive high head pressure where my ventricals have be deformed and my brain has be squished and radiated. My eyes do not work together so I have poor depth perception. I am half deaf, suffer from bilateral Tinnitus, wear two hearing aides, and I struggle to hear. I have scoliosis, arthritis, vertigo and poor balance. I walk with a cane. I have poor memory, I cannot stand for long periods of time and my coping skills are failing me. I cannot drive because I have trouble concentrating on the tasks involved. I am able to take a bus for short distances but struggle to remember routes. I was diagnosed with two Schwannomas (brain tumors) and had them radiated. They are in remission. In conclussion, let me add that I suffer, not from just poor memory and slowed mental functions, because of a Corpus Callosum that has been "elevated and thinned" but I also suffer from depression that medication has not resolved. I survive, to this day, because my wife works to support us, but because I can get up, in the morning, make coffee and fix my wife some toast, I am not considered disabled in this judge's eyes. The findings of fact, in my case were that I meet "the insured status requirements of the Social Security Act." That I have not "engaged in substantial gainful activity since January 2011" even though I have had vocational counselors and a neuro-psychologist working to find what I can still do for gainful employment. This judge found that my "impairments cause significant functional limitations" and that the medical impact is "more than a minimal effect on the capacity for basic functions and are 'severe' in accordance with 20CFR 404.1520(c) and Social Security ruling 85-20." This judge found that I do not have "an impairment or combination of impairments that meets or medically equals the severity of one of the listed impairments in 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (20 CFR 404.1520(d), 4043152 and 4041526). Social Securities own expert testified in court, before this judge that they knew of no job I could still perform without excessive supervision and that in their opinion I more than meet the standards for being disabled. THIS JUDGE DENIED MY CLAIM If you are unfortunate to get this judge assigned to your case, I pray that your attorney has done their work and pray that God has assigned considerable time to your case. Without that, you do not stand a chance!
This judge is terrible and only knows the black and white print of the law and the the "spirit" of the law. She should be removed! I have suffered from hydrocephalus (water on the brain) my whole life. I have had 38 operations for shunt revisions and have brain damage from excessive high head pressure where my ventricals have be deformed and my brain has be squished and radiated. My eyes do not work together so I have poor depth perception. I am half deaf, suffer from bilateral Tinnitus, wear two hearing aides, and I struggle to hear. I have scoliosis, arthritis, vertigo and poor balance. I walk with a cane. I have poor memory, I cannot stand for long periods of time and my coping skills are failing me. I cannot drive because I have trouble concentrating on the tasks involved. I am able to take a bus for short distances but struggle to remember routes. I was diagnosed with two Schwannomas (brain tumors) and had them radiated. They are in remission. In conclussion, let me add that I suffer, not from just poor memory and slowed mental functions, because of a Corpus Callosum that has been "elevated and thinned" but I also suffer from depression that medication has not resolved. I survive, to this day, because my wife works to support us, but because I can get up, in the morning, make coffee and fix my wife some toast, I am not considered disabled in this judge's eyes. The findings of fact, in my case were that I meet "the insured status requirements of the Social Security Act." That I have not "engaged in substantial gainful activity since January 2011" even though I have had vocational counselors and a neuro-psychologist working to find what I can still do for gainful employment. This judge found that my "impairments cause significant functional limitations" and that the medical impact is "more than a minimal effect on the capacity for basic functions and are 'severe' in accordance with 20CFR 404.1520(c) and Social Security ruling 85-20." This judge found that I do not have "an impairment or combination of impairments that meets or medically equals the severity of one of the listed impairments in 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (20 CFR 404.1520(d), 4043152 and 4041526). Social Securities own expert testified in court, before this judge that they knew of no job I could still perform without excessive supervision and that in their opinion I more than meet the standards for being disabled. THIS JUDGE DENIED MY CLAIM If you are unfortunate to get this judge assigned to your case, I pray that your attorney has done their work and pray that God has assigned considerable time to your case. Without that, you do not stand a chance!
This judge is terrible and only knows the black and white print of the law and the the "spirit" of the law. She should be removed! I have suffered from hydrocephalus (water on the brain) my whole life. I have had 38 operations for shunt revisions and have brain damage from excessive high head pressure where my ventricals have be deformed and my brain has be squished and radiated. My eyes do not work together so I have poor depth perception. I am half deaf, suffer from bilateral Tinnitus, wear two hearing aides, and I struggle to hear. I have scoliosis, arthritis, vertigo and poor balance. I walk with a cane. I have poor memory, I cannot stand for long periods of time and my coping skills are failing me. I cannot drive because I have trouble concentrating on the tasks involved. I am able to take a bus for short distances but struggle to remember routes. I was diagnosed with two Schwannomas (brain tumors) and had them radiated. They are in remission. In conclussion, let me add that I suffer, not from just poor memory and slowed mental functions, because of a Corpus Callosum that has been "elevated and thinned" but I also suffer from depression that medication has not resolved. I survive, to this day, because my wife works to support us, but because I can get up, in the morning, make coffee and fix my wife some toast, I am not considered disabled in this judge's eyes. The findings of fact, in my case were that I meet "the insured status requirements of the Social Security Act." That I have not "engaged in substantial gainful activity since January 2011" even though I have had vocational counselors and a neuro-psychologist working to find what I can still do for gainful employment. This judge found that my "impairments cause significant functional limitations" and that the medical impact is "more than a minimal effect on the capacity for basic functions and are 'severe' in accordance with 20CFR 404.1520(c) and Social Security ruling 85-20." This judge found that I do not have "an impairment or combination of impairments that meets or medically equals the severity of one of the listed impairments in 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (20 CFR 404.1520(d), 4043152 and 4041526). Social Securities own expert testified in court, before this judge that they knew of no job I could still perform without excessive supervision and that in their opinion I more than meet the standards for being disabled. THIS JUDGE DENIED MY CLAIM If you are unfortunate to get this judge assigned to your case, I pray that your attorney has done their work and pray that God has assigned considerable time to your case. Without that, you do not stand a chance!
I rate this Judge as not acceptable because her deny rate is higher the rate of the entire state of California! Also she refuses to accept documented facts about state appointed medical examiners, lack of credentials.
I rate this Judge as not acceptable because her deny rate is higher the rate of the entire state of California! Also she refuses to accept documented facts about state appointed medical examiners, lack of credentials.
I rate this Judge as not acceptable because her deny rate is higher the rate of the entire state of California! Also she refuses to accept documented facts about state appointed medical examiners, lack of credentials.
Honorable Tracy, I have just submitted an appeal application that has been submitted 5 times at the San Rafael office but never left or was not submitted for appeal process, however I continued to search daily for an answer on how I can have my Social Security Disability case reviewed by someone outside of the San Rafael office, who kept telling me every time I requested an appeal or someone else to look at my case to see why my complete SSD back pay was offset to an over payment that I was current on payments, and the over payment was not delinquent, I begged, cried, for the several employees at San Rafael office to reconsider reversing the offset due to extreme financial hardship, to no avail. I Thank God that he directed your information my way I feel hopeful that you are someone in your office can review my case to see how the San Rafael office has repeatedly offset my benefits without prior notice. I humbly ask you to at your convenience for my special needs child review my case I have documents showing SSA withholding $7000, more and the over payment total is going up, yes I tell you the complete truth your Honor, I have not received any of my retro-active payments which there is more in limbo. I look forward to meeting you, speaking with you, at your convenience, I believe you are fair, and will listen, and review the documents that shows the many errors made by Social Security Administration. Thanks Your Honor Tracy
Honorable Tracy, I have just submitted an appeal application that has been submitted 5 times at the San Rafael office but never left or was not submitted for appeal process, however I continued to search daily for an answer on how I can have my Social Security Disability case reviewed by someone outside of the San Rafael office, who kept telling me every time I requested an appeal or someone else to look at my case to see why my complete SSD back pay was offset to an over payment that I was current on payments, and the over payment was not delinquent, I begged, cried, for the several employees at San Rafael office to reconsider reversing the offset due to extreme financial hardship, to no avail. I Thank God that he directed your information my way I feel hopeful that you are someone in your office can review my case to see how the San Rafael office has repeatedly offset my benefits without prior notice. I humbly ask you to at your convenience for my special needs child review my case I have documents showing SSA withholding $7000, more and the over payment total is going up, yes I tell you the complete truth your Honor, I have not received any of my retro-active payments which there is more in limbo. I look forward to meeting you, speaking with you, at your convenience, I believe you are fair, and will listen, and review the documents that shows the many errors made by Social Security Administration. Thanks Your Honor Tracy
Honorable Tracy, I have just submitted an appeal application that has been submitted 5 times at the San Rafael office but never left or was not submitted for appeal process, however I continued to search daily for an answer on how I can have my Social Security Disability case reviewed by someone outside of the San Rafael office, who kept telling me every time I requested an appeal or someone else to look at my case to see why my complete SSD back pay was offset to an over payment that I was current on payments, and the over payment was not delinquent, I begged, cried, for the several employees at San Rafael office to reconsider reversing the offset due to extreme financial hardship, to no avail. I Thank God that he directed your information my way I feel hopeful that you are someone in your office can review my case to see how the San Rafael office has repeatedly offset my benefits without prior notice. I humbly ask you to at your convenience for my special needs child review my case I have documents showing SSA withholding $7000, more and the over payment total is going up, yes I tell you the complete truth your Honor, I have not received any of my retro-active payments which there is more in limbo. I look forward to meeting you, speaking with you, at your convenience, I believe you are fair, and will listen, and review the documents that shows the many errors made by Social Security Administration. Thanks Your Honor Tracy