Ronald D Lahners , Omaha, Nebraska ODAR Office, Administrative Law Judge

For the 2017 *fiscal year, Judge Ronald D Lahners has disposed 242 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Omaha, Nebraska. Out of those 242 dispostions, 53 were dismissed, 134 were approved and 55 were denied. This means that the percentage of dispositions that Judge Lahners has approved in Omaha for the 2017 fiscal year is 55%. The information below for Judge Ronald D Lahners was last updated on 6/14/2017.

Average statistics
Office*Fiscal YearTotal DispositionsTotal DecisionsTotal DenialsTotal AwardsCases
Dismissed
Cases
Approved
Cases
Denied
Omaha 2010 383 335 112 223 13%58%29%
Omaha 2011 323 263 121 142 19%44%37%
Omaha 2012 408 328 147 181 20%44%36%
Omaha 2013 436 347 114 233 20%53%26%
Omaha 2014 367 288 111 177 22%48%30%
Omaha 2015 386 310 112 198 20%51%29%
Omaha 2016 347 262 92 170 24%49%27%
Omaha 2017 242 189 55 134 22%55%23%
 Totals:28922322864145820%50%30%
*The United States Government fiscal year is from October 1st - September 30th.
AVERAGE TIME
 DismissedApprovedDenied
Judge Lahners22%55%23%
All ALJs in Omaha Office 21% 44% 35%
All ALJs in Nebraska21%44%35%
All ALJs in the Nation21%45%34%
LATEST COMMENTS      to leave your comment about Ronald D Lahners please fill form below comments
Depressed1976
Judge: Ronald D Lahners
5/4/2013 5:31:18 PM



I believe Judge Lahners is an older judge with older opinions and values. He needs to step down or retire. He asked me questions during my hearing that were tacky and rude and in no way did they pertain to my claim. In his letter to me that denied my claim, he repeated the same topics over and over again and did not consider all the evidence. He even said that state doctors that I was seeing were not credible. Isn't SSD state or government owned? Is he referring to his own office as well. I believe he had "no" already in his mind as soon as the hearing began. Government services did not move very fast but his denial letter was typed and mailed to me withn 8 days of the hearing. I did not receive a fair hearing and it was prejudicial because I had a bad advocate at my first hearing and he cut the hearing short and said "to be continued." My attorney had a steep hill to climb and as I said -- and Judge Lahners had "no" in his mind as we progressed through the hearing. Shame on him. Please retire.



Share your comments about Judge Ronald D Lahners

Please Note: This site is privately owned and is not administered by or affiliated with the Social Security Administration.

DO NOT SHARE PERSONAL INFORMATION. These comments are public and are not sent to the SSA, ODAR or the Judge.

The judge might see these comments if he/she views this page, so think before you post. If you need a post removed, please use the "contact us" form on this site. All comments require a valid email address, and your comment will not be made public until you verify your post via email.

Type your comments below:
Rate This Judge:  
Your Name:  
*optional
Your Email:  
*required, will not be shown in post


Click here to view complete statistical data for this Judge