Suanne S Strauss , Elkins Park, Pennsylvania ODAR Office, Administrative Law Judge

For the 2018 *fiscal year, Judge Suanne S Strauss has disposed 109 cases at the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR) in Elkins Park, Pennsylvania. Out of those 109 dispostions, 11 were dismissed, 61 were approved and 37 were denied. This means that the percentage of dispositions that Judge Strauss has approved in Elkins Park for the 2018 fiscal year is 56%. The information below for Judge Suanne S Strauss was last updated on 3/9/2018.

Average statistics
Office*Fiscal YearTotal DispositionsTotal DecisionsTotal DenialsTotal AwardsCases
Dismissed
Cases
Approved
Cases
Denied
Elkins Park 2010 555 458 133 325 17%59%24%
Elkins Park 2011 593 469 183 286 21%48%31%
Elkins Park 2012 588 420 164 256 29%44%28%
Elkins Park 2013 585 432 160 272 26%46%27%
Elkins Park 2014 568 419 155 264 26%46%27%
Elkins Park 2015 472 359 128 231 24%49%27%
Elkins Park 2016 489 359 111 248 27%51%23%
Elkins Park 2017 521 390 130 260 25%50%25%
Elkins Park 2018 109 98 37 61 10%56%34%
 Totals:448034041201220324%49%27%
*The United States Government fiscal year is from October 1st - September 30th.
AVERAGE TIME
 DismissedApprovedDenied
Judge Strauss10%56%34%
All ALJs in Elkins Park Office 25% 41% 34%
All ALJs in Pennsylvania27%40%34%
All ALJs in the Nation21%43%36%
LATEST COMMENTS      to leave your comment about Suanne S Strauss please fill form below comments
Marige O'Brien
Judge: Suanne S Strauss
5/28/2013 9:44:12 AM



Judge Strauss presided over my disability hearing on August 19, 2011 and ruled against me, despite 4 separate doctors attesting that I was and am disabled -- two of which were appointed by SSDI -- as well as her own court-appointed work-expert. All agreed I could not work. But one doctor, who was ignorant of my condition, submitted a highly biased report and, according to her decision, was the only doctor she believed. At least, she cited his report six times in her statement, never mentioning any others. What she did not know was that, prior to the hearing, I had asked my lawyer to submit a statement by me as evidence. I knew this doctor was prejudiced against me because I did not have health insurance. (I had read the report, myself.) As a result, his report was littered with inaccuracies and out-right lies. Several times he quoted me as saying things that were said TO me, but to which I had not even considered. Yet he presented them as my ideas. But, what I only found out AFTER the hearing was that my lawyer never submitted my statement. When I questioned him, his reason was that it was, "too long." Excuse me but, I understood that in any court hearing, evidence no matter the length must be considered. Yet, when I first sent it to him and asked if it was all right to submit it, he said it was, "fine." This implied to me that he would submit it. So I walked into that hearing thinking she had read my statement. This explains her remarks, many of which were, simply put, rude. But in all her comments, never once did she interview me about the doctor in question, not even to verify any of his comments. After my hearing, it took some time for me to understand the whole situation. Remember, I am disabled. In a 'nutshell' the doctor is God and no one questions them-- even when they are openly biased against someone. Not the judge, not other doctors and not even my own lawyer. My hearing was a farce. While Judge Strauss was permitted to base 90% of her decision on one report from one, ignorant doctor (and, really, with the internet available to everyone, this in itself, shows gross negligence), she did so with prejudice since the examination from which this report resulted was never discussed in the hearing. Never once was I allowed to comment on it, so that my comments were never allowed into the record. Since the entire purpose of a hearing is to reveal all information relevant to a case and this was not even attempted, nor achieved, the decision and the hearing were based primarily on prejudice rather than evidence. Since that time, I have suffered greatly, both medically and financially, as a direct result of this judgement.


Judge: Suanne S Strauss
2/20/2013 10:03:45 AM



I have appeared before this ALJ many times. She knows the claimant's file and lets you present your case. I find her to be very reasonable and smart.


Judge: Suanne S Strauss
8/2/2012 11:14:20 AM



UNQUALIFIED > WHAT GOVENOR APPOINTED THIS IDIOT WITH HER BIG FAT SALARY SHE SHOULD NEVER BE RE APPOINTED.


Judge: Suanne S Strauss
4/28/2012 9:29:21 AM







Share your comments about Judge Suanne S Strauss

Please Note: This site is privately owned and is not administered by or affiliated with the Social Security Administration.

DO NOT SHARE PERSONAL INFORMATION. These comments are public and are not sent to the SSA, ODAR or the Judge.

The judge might see these comments if he/she views this page, so think before you post. If you need a post removed, please use the "contact us" form on this site. All comments require a valid email address, and your comment will not be made public until you verify your post via email.

Type your comments below:
Rate This Judge:  
Your Name:  
*optional
Your Email:  
*required, will not be shown in post


Click here to view complete statistical data for this Judge